Comparison Overview

Ticketmaster

VS

TikTok

Ticketmaster

325 N Maple Dr, None, Beverly Hills, California, US, 90210
Last Update: 2025-11-24

Ticketmaster gives millions of fans – worldwide – fair and easy access to the biggest and best in live entertainment. Driven by innovation, unparalleled scalability, and unmatched support, we are the definitive leader in professional ticketing solutions. Over 12,000 artists, teams, and venues around the world trust us to power their amazing performances daily — with more than 500 million tickets sold each year. We are a diverse team of 6,500+ global employees and a proud division of Live Nation Entertainment (NYSE: LYV), the world’s leading live entertainment company and an organization certified as a Great Place to Work®. Everything we do starts with our passion to dream, design, and deliver the unforgettable experience of live. Because we’re fans too — and live only happens once.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 6,768
Subsidiaries: 26
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

TikTok

Los Angeles, California, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

TikTok is a discovery tool made just for you. TikTok is a global platform for discovery, joy and endless possibilities — connecting and entertaining more than a billion people across more than 150 countries. TikTok's headquarters are in Los Angeles and Singapore, with additional offices in Austin, Dublin, Paris, Berlin, Dubai, Jakarta, Johannesburg, London, New York, Mexico City, Sao Paolo, San Jose, Seoul, Seattle, and Tokyo.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 74,662
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ticketmaster.jpeg
Ticketmaster
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tiktok.jpeg
TikTok
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ticketmaster
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TikTok
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

Ticketmaster has 28.21% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

TikTok has 412.82% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Ticketmaster (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ticketmaster cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TikTok (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TikTok cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ticketmaster.jpeg
Ticketmaster
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: SQL injection vulnerabilities, Insider access mechanisms, Zero-day vulnerabilities
Motivation: Financial gain through selling data on dark web marketplaces
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of vulnerabilities in cloud storage services
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Snowflake Account
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tiktok.jpeg
TikTok
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized access, possibly through internal systems or third-party database
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Legal Compliance
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Regulatory Compliance
Blog: Blog

FAQ

TikTok company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ticketmaster company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ticketmaster company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to TikTok company.

In the current year, TikTok company has reported more cyber incidents than Ticketmaster company.

Neither TikTok company nor Ticketmaster company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both TikTok company and Ticketmaster company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Both TikTok company and Ticketmaster company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

TikTok company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Ticketmaster company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ticketmaster nor TikTok holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ticketmaster company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TikTok company.

TikTok company employs more people globally than Ticketmaster company, reflecting its scale as a Entertainment Providers.

Neither Ticketmaster nor TikTok holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ticketmaster nor TikTok holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ticketmaster nor TikTok holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ticketmaster nor TikTok holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ticketmaster nor TikTok holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ticketmaster nor TikTok holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H