Comparison Overview

Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation.

VS

Transport for NSW

Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation.

13F., No. 66, Jingmao 2nd Rd., Nangang District, Taipei City 11568, Taiwan (R.O.C.), Taipei City, Nangang District, 11568, TW
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thsrc.com.tw/index.html

Taiwan High Speed Rail Consortium was formed in November 1996 to bid for the HSR BOT Project and was selected the Best Applicant in September 1997. Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation (THSRC) was incorporated in May 1998 as the Concessionaire to build and operate the HSR service. In July 23, 1998, the agreements were signed between MOTC (representing the ROC Government) and the THSRC, which have granted THSRC a concession to finance, construct, and operate the High Speed Rail System for a period of 35 years and a concession for HSR station area development for a period of 50 years. The HSR will link Taipei to Kaohsiung at a total length of 345km with 90 minutes traveling time. During the first stage of the operation, eight stations of the high speed rail will be operated, namely, Taipei, Banqiao, Taoyuan, Hsinchu, Taichung, Chiayi, Tainan, and Kaohsiung (Zuoying), and by 2010, four more stations will be open, i.e., Nangang, Miaoli, Changhua and Yunlin.

NAICS: 484
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 653
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Transport for NSW

Multiple locations , Multiple locations, Multiple locations across the state, NSW, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au

We’re an innovative NSW government organisation comprised of a network of agencies and divisions that keep the state moving. Our focus is on delivering safe, reliable and integrated transport networks for everyone. With over 28,000 team members, we’re committed to inclusion, diversity, and opportunities across metro and regional areas. Join us in shaping a transport network that meets the needs of customers now and into the future. Right now, we’re focused on making transport fairer and safer for everyone and delivering a more resilient and reliable network. It is all with the view of continually creating better passenger journeys and safer travel for the people using our networks. This also means meaningful employment opportunities across metropolitan and regional areas, with careers in engineering, technology, safety, design, planning, maintenance and frontline jobs delivering services to our passengers. We’re not just about what we do, but how we do it. Our culture embraces innovation, diversity, and collaboration, ensuring our people thrive while making a lasting impact. The road ahead is full of opportunity - join us in building the future of transport in NSW.

NAICS: 484
NAICS Definition: Truck Transportation
Employees: 18,524
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thsrc.jpeg
Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-for-nsw.jpeg
Transport for NSW
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transport for NSW
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. in 2025.

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transport for NSW in 2025.

Incident History — Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transport for NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport for NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thsrc.jpeg
Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-for-nsw.jpeg
Transport for NSW
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2021
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data exfiltration
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Transport for NSW company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transport for NSW company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Transport for NSW company and Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Transport for NSW company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Transport for NSW company nor Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Transport for NSW company nor Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. company nor Transport for NSW company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. nor Transport for NSW holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. company nor Transport for NSW company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Transport for NSW company employs more people globally than Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. company, reflecting its scale as a Truck Transportation.

Neither Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. nor Transport for NSW holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. nor Transport for NSW holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. nor Transport for NSW holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. nor Transport for NSW holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. nor Transport for NSW holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation. nor Transport for NSW holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References