Comparison Overview

Three Springs

VS

Youth Dynamics of Montana

Three Springs

1131 Eagletree Ln., Huntsville, AL, 35601, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Programs for troubled teens; residential, educational and outdoor therapeutic programs. Three Springs is a nationally-recognized leader in youth services. Founded in 1985 to provide therapy and education to adolescents struggling with emotional, behavioral and learning issues, our experienced, trained staff members strive to provide compassionate, professional support to the children in our care

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Youth Dynamics of Montana

2334 Lewis Ave, Billings, MT, 59102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Youth Dynamics (YDI) and Yellowstone Boys and Girls Ranch (YBGR) are joining forces to be Montana's most comprehensive provider of children's mental health. YDI is now doing business as YBGR. Youth Dynamics has been providing support to Montana kids and families since 1981. Our therapeutic services for children and families include: caregiver education and support, mentoring, case management, therapy, group home care, supported foster care, respite services, equine therapy, and medication management. In addition, we offer substance abuse services, reunification services, and community education. Our ultimate goal is to make a difference in Montana, one child at a time. We believe in supporting children and families and empowering them for a brighter tomorrow. As our footprint on Montana grows, so does the need to expand our teams. We are always looking for talented and caring individuals to help us in our mission to support Montana kids and families. Our positions include: therapists, leadership members, local managers, nurse practitioners or psychiatrists, youth home workers, day treatment workers, family development coordinators, mentors, community educators, case managers, care managers, and administrative support staff. If you have a passion for helping children and families and want to be part of the solution, then you will find yourself at home as part of our Youth Dynamics family. For more information on Youth Dynamics, call us at 1-877-458-7022, email [email protected], or visit our website at www.youthdynamics.org

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/three-springs.jpeg
Three Springs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/youth-dynamics-of-montana.jpeg
Youth Dynamics of Montana
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Three Springs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Youth Dynamics of Montana
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Three Springs in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Youth Dynamics of Montana in 2026.

Incident History — Three Springs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Three Springs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Youth Dynamics of Montana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Youth Dynamics of Montana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/three-springs.jpeg
Three Springs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/youth-dynamics-of-montana.jpeg
Youth Dynamics of Montana
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Youth Dynamics of Montana company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Three Springs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Youth Dynamics of Montana company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Three Springs company.

In the current year, Youth Dynamics of Montana company and Three Springs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Youth Dynamics of Montana company nor Three Springs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Youth Dynamics of Montana company nor Three Springs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Youth Dynamics of Montana company nor Three Springs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Three Springs company nor Youth Dynamics of Montana company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Three Springs nor Youth Dynamics of Montana holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Three Springs company nor Youth Dynamics of Montana company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Youth Dynamics of Montana company employs more people globally than Three Springs company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Three Springs nor Youth Dynamics of Montana holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Three Springs nor Youth Dynamics of Montana holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Three Springs nor Youth Dynamics of Montana holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Three Springs nor Youth Dynamics of Montana holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Three Springs nor Youth Dynamics of Montana holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Three Springs nor Youth Dynamics of Montana holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N