Comparison Overview

Thompson Design Group

VS

Camp Pixel

Thompson Design Group

None
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 800 and 849

We balance strong brand strategy with inspired creativity. We help our clients fulfill their brand's promise and visually bring their brands to life. We were founded in 1980 by designer Dennis Matthew Thompson and strategist Jody Shoults Thompson. The multicultural city of San Francisco has been our home for more than 25 years. Our group shares a passion for design and believes in three simple tenets - do good work, honor relationships, and achieve excellent results.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Camp Pixel

607 NW 28th St, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Camp Pixel is a versatile and imaginative creative services studio that crafts effective digital branding and graphical solutions for an assortment of industries. Creating lively animation, sensible branding, and stunning visualizations are the cornerstones of our company, but we welcome all ideas into our camp, letting project needs become our map while our expertise and talent serve as our guide. We like to have fun, but we’re serious about staying on top of the evolving digital landscape and the latest technological advancements. We’re the experts so you don’t have to be, but we’re always open to discovering new possibilities together with our clients. We can even set up camp and work remotely with you on location. We’re here to creatively clarify your message. Please feel free to check out the vast array of creative services we offer, and if you like what you see, send us a message and let us know what we can create for you.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thompson-design-group.jpeg
Thompson Design Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/camp-pixel.jpeg
Camp Pixel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Thompson Design Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Camp Pixel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thompson Design Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Camp Pixel in 2025.

Incident History — Thompson Design Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thompson Design Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Camp Pixel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Camp Pixel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thompson-design-group.jpeg
Thompson Design Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/camp-pixel.jpeg
Camp Pixel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Thompson Design Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Camp Pixel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Camp Pixel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Thompson Design Group company.

In the current year, Camp Pixel company and Thompson Design Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Camp Pixel company nor Thompson Design Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Camp Pixel company nor Thompson Design Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Camp Pixel company nor Thompson Design Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Thompson Design Group company nor Camp Pixel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Thompson Design Group nor Camp Pixel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Thompson Design Group company nor Camp Pixel company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Thompson Design Group company employs more people globally than Camp Pixel company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Thompson Design Group nor Camp Pixel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Thompson Design Group nor Camp Pixel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Thompson Design Group nor Camp Pixel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Thompson Design Group nor Camp Pixel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Thompson Design Group nor Camp Pixel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Thompson Design Group nor Camp Pixel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X