Comparison Overview

Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC

VS

Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright

Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC

7330 N 16th St, Phoenix, 85020, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC is a law firm devoted entirely to the litigation and trial of civil cases. We believe that a claim is best represented by an aggressive attorney who develops a case early and presents it effectively for arbitration, settlement, or trial. Additionally, our attorneys are mindful of the need for practical, efficient litigation techniques that bring about the best results for the client.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright

L5-07, LEVEL 5, WISMA BU 8, PETALING JAYA, 47800, MY
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Quality Oracle is an Intellectual Property (IP) firm providing a full range of IP services in Malaysia through a team of legally qualified lawyers with 27 years of experience in IP, Corporate Advisory (CA) and Company Secretary (CS) services. The Quality Oracle team has been building trust for more than two decades by supporting individuals and businesses in all areas of Intellectual Property Rights including trademark, patent, industrial designs and copyright registration in Malaysia and around the world. From Technical Expert to former Patent Examiner, our IP practice brings together a team of industry-leading professionals. With engineer know-how and patent examine perspectives, our diverse team is capable of drafting quality patent specifications to effectively minimise office actions and legal risks while maximizing the scope of patent protection. Trademark and Intellectual Property (IP) Advisory Services is our expertise. Quality Oracle provides a full spectrum of IP services, anytime, anywhere, locally and globally.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-rubin-kelley-pc.jpeg
Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright in 2025.

Incident History — Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-rubin-kelley-pc.jpeg
Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qualityoracle.jpeg
Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC company and Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC company.

In the current year, Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright company and Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright company nor Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright company nor Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright company nor Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC company nor Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC nor Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC company nor Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC company employs more people globally than Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC nor Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC nor Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC nor Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC nor Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC nor Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Thomas Rubin & Kelley PC nor Quality Oracle Group Malaysia - Trademarks, Patent, Industrial Design, Copyright holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X