Comparison Overview

Thomas Printworks

VS

FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association

Thomas Printworks

600 N. Central Expressway, Richardson, TX, 75080, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

We started with a focus on traditional blueprints servicing the architecture, engineering, and construction industries. We never would have imagined that our business would now be in its third generation of family ownership and have over 300 employees spanning 25 locations in the U.S. Thomas Printworks hasn’t just survived, but thrived as a leading choice among the A/E/C industry for commercial printing needs. We’ve been able to do so because of how we build relationships with our customers and stay up to date on the latest technology in the trade. We set the standard for our customers rather than following it. Today, Thomas Printworks is a recognized name in the industry with locations also in the Houston, Austin, San Antonio, Phoenix, Minneapolis, Orlando, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami metropolitan areas. When we say It’s All In The Name, we take that personally. Thomas Printworks has lasted over 60 years because of our name and the quality of service our clients expect and rely on from that name. For our Dallas customers, you can even find our original location still in operation after all these years. The technology, processes, and product demands may change, but what won’t change is our dedication to providing friendly and professional service. If you’re ready to bring your printing and document management ideas to life, contact one of our specialists today and we’ll reach back to help you start your next project.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 344
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association

TOPEKA, 66614, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

The Foil & Specialty Effects Association (FSEA) provides a wide range of resources to help companies remain profitable today and into the future. From cost-saving programs and educational opportunities to green initiatives proving the sustainability of foil decorated paper/board, the FSEA strives to provide its members with ideas, resources and solutions to grow in today’s marketplace. For more information, visit www.fsea.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-reprographics.jpeg
Thomas Printworks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fsea-foil-specialty-effects-association.jpeg
FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Thomas Printworks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thomas Printworks in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association in 2025.

Incident History — Thomas Printworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thomas Printworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-reprographics.jpeg
Thomas Printworks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fsea-foil-specialty-effects-association.jpeg
FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Thomas Printworks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Thomas Printworks company.

In the current year, FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company and Thomas Printworks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company nor Thomas Printworks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company nor Thomas Printworks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company nor Thomas Printworks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Thomas Printworks company nor FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Thomas Printworks nor FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Thomas Printworks company.

Thomas Printworks company employs more people globally than FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Thomas Printworks nor FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Thomas Printworks nor FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Thomas Printworks nor FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Thomas Printworks nor FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Thomas Printworks nor FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Thomas Printworks nor FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N