Comparison Overview

Jefferson Health

VS

BayCare Health System

Jefferson Health

130 South Ninth Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://JeffersonHealth.org

Thomas Jefferson University and Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals are partners in providing excellent clinical and compassionate care for our patients in the Philadelphia region, educating the health professionals of tomorrow in a variety of disciplines and discovering new knowledge that will define the future of clinical care. Thomas Jefferson University is dedicated to health sciences education and research.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,861
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

BayCare Health System

2985 Drew St, None, Clearwater, Florida, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.baycare.org

BayCare is a leading not-for-profit academic health care system that connects individuals and families to a wide range of services at 16 hospitals, including a children’s hospital, and hundreds of other convenient locations throughout the Tampa Bay and central Florida regions. The system is West Central Florida's largest provider of behavioral health and pediatric services and its provider group, BayCare Medical Group, is one of the largest in the region. BayCare's diverse network of ambulatory services includes laboratories, imaging, surgical centers, BayCare Urgent Care locations, wellness centers and one of Florida's largest home care agencies, BayCare HomeCare. BayCare's mission is to improve the health of all it serves through community-owned, health care services that set the standard for high-quality, compassionate care. For more information, visit BayCare.org.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,376
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-jefferson-university-hospitals.jpeg
Jefferson Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baycare-health-system.jpeg
BayCare Health System
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jefferson Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BayCare Health System
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jefferson Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BayCare Health System in 2025.

Incident History — Jefferson Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jefferson Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BayCare Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BayCare Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-jefferson-university-hospitals.jpeg
Jefferson Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baycare-health-system.jpeg
BayCare Health System
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jefferson Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BayCare Health System company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Jefferson Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas BayCare Health System company has not reported any.

In the current year, BayCare Health System company and Jefferson Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BayCare Health System company nor Jefferson Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Jefferson Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other BayCare Health System company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Jefferson Health company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while BayCare Health System company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Jefferson Health company nor BayCare Health System company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jefferson Health nor BayCare Health System holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Jefferson Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BayCare Health System company.

Jefferson Health company employs more people globally than BayCare Health System company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Jefferson Health nor BayCare Health System holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jefferson Health nor BayCare Health System holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jefferson Health nor BayCare Health System holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jefferson Health nor BayCare Health System holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jefferson Health nor BayCare Health System holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jefferson Health nor BayCare Health System holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References