Comparison Overview

Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC

VS

Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP

Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC

8390 E Crescent Pkwy, Suite 500, Greenwood Village, Colorado, US, 80111
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith, LLC is a criminal and civil defense law firm based in the Denver Tech Center. With over 24 years of experience, we are dedicated to providing the highest level of client service while delivering innovative solutions and outstanding legal representation. We handle cases including workers’ compensation defense, insurance law, liability defense, subrogation & recovery, employment law and appellate cases.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP

235 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California, 94104, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We specialize in land use, real estate, and homeowners association (HOA) litigation and transactions. Our experienced attorneys provide tailored legal solutions for zoning disputes, property development, regulatory compliance, and HOA governance. Whether you're a property developer or HOA board member, we're committed to protecting your interests with strategic advocacy and efficient representation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas&associateslawfirmllc.jpeg
Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/briscoe-ivester-&-bazel-llp.jpeg
Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas&associateslawfirmllc.jpeg
Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/briscoe-ivester-&-bazel-llp.jpeg
Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC company and Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC company.

In the current year, Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP company and Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP company nor Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP company nor Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP company nor Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC company nor Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC nor Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC company nor Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP company employs more people globally than Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC nor Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC nor Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC nor Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC nor Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC nor Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Thomas, Ahnell, Laraway & Smith LLC nor Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X