Comparison Overview

Thinking Caps Design

VS

Jerney de Jong

Thinking Caps Design

1425 North First Street, Suite 101, Phoenix, Arizona, 85004, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Making first impressions is what we do at Thinking Caps Design. We know people are hardwired to gauge what’s important in an instant. So our studio brainstorms the best way to impress quickly with brand identity, interpretive and wayfinding graphics. We have an intuitive knack for bringing clarity, meaning and emotion to the experience of interacting with brands in the built environment. Impactful graphic solutions from Thinking Caps Design punctuate our cityscape and institutions in civic parks, convention centers, trailheads, hospitals, commercial buildings, universities and transportation centers. Crafting an authentic sense of place is our passion. Located in a restored mid-century modern space within the Central Arts District of Phoenix, Thinking Caps Design engages with clients throughout the southwest. Wherever you are going, we can help you get there.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jerney de Jong

Klimopstraat 38 Den Haag, Zuid-Holland 2565 VM, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

I’m passionate about brands and graphic design. To make a brand or product understandable and successful, to make a practical solution that is both functional and beautiful. My approach to a project is driven by creativity and conceptual thinking. I believe that every detail of an visual identity must sum up into one coherent experience. I find working closely with my clients is the best way to create solutions that will last. I work for a diverse range of clients, from individuals to brands, creative agencies and large organisations. More info or just want to say ‘hi’, feel free to contact me!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thinking-caps-design.jpeg
Thinking Caps Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jerney-de-jong.jpeg
Jerney de Jong
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Thinking Caps Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jerney de Jong
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thinking Caps Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jerney de Jong in 2025.

Incident History — Thinking Caps Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thinking Caps Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jerney de Jong (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jerney de Jong cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thinking-caps-design.jpeg
Thinking Caps Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jerney-de-jong.jpeg
Jerney de Jong
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jerney de Jong company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Thinking Caps Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jerney de Jong company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Thinking Caps Design company.

In the current year, Jerney de Jong company and Thinking Caps Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jerney de Jong company nor Thinking Caps Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jerney de Jong company nor Thinking Caps Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jerney de Jong company nor Thinking Caps Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Thinking Caps Design company nor Jerney de Jong company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Thinking Caps Design nor Jerney de Jong holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Thinking Caps Design company nor Jerney de Jong company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Thinking Caps Design company employs more people globally than Jerney de Jong company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Thinking Caps Design nor Jerney de Jong holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Thinking Caps Design nor Jerney de Jong holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Thinking Caps Design nor Jerney de Jong holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Thinking Caps Design nor Jerney de Jong holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Thinking Caps Design nor Jerney de Jong holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Thinking Caps Design nor Jerney de Jong holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X