Comparison Overview

Thinkfuse

VS

Baidu, Inc.

Thinkfuse

Last Update: 2024-07-01 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Thinkfuse is an Enterprise Software-as-a-Service platform that turns the dreaded weekly status report into a powerful business intelligence tool. The company was created by co-founders Brandon Bloom and Steve Krenzel and is a member of the TechStars Seattle class of 2010.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 46
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
4

Baidu, Inc.

Baidu Campus,, Beijing, undefined, 100085, CN
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Baidu is a leading AI company with strong Internet foundation, driven by our mission to โ€œmake the complicated world simpler through technologyโ€. Founded in 2000 as a search engine platform, we were an early adopter of artificial intelligence in 2010. Since then, we have established a full AI stack, from deep learning frameworks to models and applications, with industry-leading self-developed technology at every level. Over the past two decades, we have built a diversified portfolio of products and services, spanning an ecosystem of hundreds of millions of users, millions of developers, and hundreds of thousands of enterprises. We have now integrated our leading AI capabilities into our offerings, driving innovative use cases. Join us to shape the future of AI and technology. For media inquiries, contact us at [email protected]. For career opportunities, visit https://talent.baidu.com/static/index.html

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 25,945
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thinkfuse.jpeg
Thinkfuse
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baidu-inc.jpeg
Baidu, Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Thinkfuse
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baidu, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thinkfuse in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baidu, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Thinkfuse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thinkfuse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Baidu, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baidu, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thinkfuse.jpeg
Thinkfuse
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Stolen OAuth Tokens, GitHub Repository Compromise, Social Engineering (Vishing/Phishing), Third-Party Software Exploitation (Salesloft Drift), Lateral Movement to Cloud Platforms (Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Okta)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Extortion/Ransom), Data Theft for Dark Web Sales, Reputation Damage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Indirect Prompt Injection, DNS Misconfiguration, Expired Trusted Domain Exploitation
Motivation: Research/Proof-of-Concept (No evidence of malicious exploitation)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Malicious OAuth Applications, Compromised GitHub Repository, Exploited OAuth Tokens (Drift/Salesloft), Secrets Exposure (TruffleHog)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Extortion), Data Theft for Resale, Reputation Damage, Further Intrusion (Credential Harvesting)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baidu-inc.jpeg
Baidu, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Thinkfuse company and Baidu, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Thinkfuse company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Baidu, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Thinkfuse company has reported more cyber incidents than Baidu, Inc. company.

Thinkfuse company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Baidu, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Thinkfuse company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Baidu, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Thinkfuse company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Baidu, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Thinkfuse company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Baidu, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Thinkfuse company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Baidu, Inc. company.

Baidu, Inc. company employs more people globally than Thinkfuse company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Volto is a ReactJS-based frontend for the Plone Content Management System. Versions 16.34.0 and below, 17.0.0 through 17.22.1, 18.0.0 through 18.27.1, and 19.0.0-alpha.1 through 19.0.0-alpha.5, an anonymous user could cause the NodeJS server part of Volto to quit with an error when visiting a specific URL. This issue is fixed in versions 16.34.1, 17.22.2, 18.27.2 and 19.0.0-alpha.6.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Traccar is an open source GPS tracking system. Default installs of Traccar on Windows between versions 6.1- 6.8.1 and non default installs between versions 5.8 - 6.0 are vulnerable to unauthenticated local file inclusion attacks which can lead to leakage of passwords or any file on the file system including the Traccar configuration file. Versions 5.8 - 6.0 are only vulnerable if <entry key='web.override'>./override</entry> is set in the configuration file. Versions 6.1 - 6.8.1 are vulnerable by default as the web override is enabled by default. The vulnerable code is removed in version 6.9.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Stalwart is a mail and collaboration server. Versions 0.13.3 and below contain an unbounded memory allocation vulnerability in the IMAP protocol parser which allows remote attackers to exhaust server memory, potentially triggering the system's out-of-memory (OOM) killer and causing a denial of service. The CommandParser implementation enforces size limits on its dynamic buffer in most parsing states, but several state handlers omit these validation checks. This issue is fixed in version 0.13.4. A workaround for this issue is to implement rate limiting and connection monitoring at the network level, however this does not provide complete protection.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

WeGIA is an open source web manager with a focus on charitable institutions. Versions 3.4.12 and below contain a Broken Access Control vulnerability, identified in the get_relatorios_socios.php endpoint. This vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to directly access sensitive personal and financial information of members without requiring authentication or authorization. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

WeGIA is an open source web manager with a focus on charitable institutions. Versions 3.4.12 and below contain an Open Redirect vulnerability, identified in the control.php endpoint, specifically in the nextPage parameter (metodo=listarUmnomeClasse=FuncionarioControle). This vulnerability allows attackers to redirect users to arbitrary external domains, enabling phishing campaigns, malicious payload distribution, or user credential theft. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X