Comparison Overview

Thiessen Communications

VS

Marfield, Inc.

Thiessen Communications

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Thiessen Communications differentiation starts with our expertise, which we have honed since the late 1930s through our work in printing, finishing, binding, coating, marketing, mailing etc... Few organizations can match our proven track record of supporting Chicago’s printing for more than 82 years. •Brochures •Pocket Folders •Calendars •Catalogs •Window Clings •Coupon Pads •Posters •Reward Cards •Books •Headers •Displays •Table Tents •Banners •Shelf Talkers •Custom Printed Boxes •Trimming •Folding •Saddle Stitching •Perfect Binding •Spiral Binding •Perforation •Scoring •Die Cutting •Foil Stamping •Embossing •Padding •Drilling •Lamination •Numbering •Shrink Wrapping •Store-Specific Packaging and Kitting •Custom Assembly •Collating •Gluing

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Marfield, Inc.

3333 Earhart Drive, Carrollton, Texas, 75006, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Award-winning commercial printing company serving national client base with business cards and stationery products. Marfield is a certified woman-owned and operated business supporting clients in corporate America, governments, universities and the small business sector. Unparalleled in-house production capabilities, brand management services and online ordering set Marfield apart from its competition.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thiessen-communications.jpeg
Thiessen Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marfieldprint.jpeg
Marfield, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Thiessen Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Marfield, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thiessen Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marfield, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Thiessen Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thiessen Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Marfield, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marfield, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thiessen-communications.jpeg
Thiessen Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marfieldprint.jpeg
Marfield, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Thiessen Communications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Marfield, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Marfield, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Thiessen Communications company.

In the current year, Marfield, Inc. company and Thiessen Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Marfield, Inc. company nor Thiessen Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Marfield, Inc. company nor Thiessen Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Marfield, Inc. company nor Thiessen Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Thiessen Communications company nor Marfield, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Thiessen Communications nor Marfield, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Thiessen Communications company nor Marfield, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marfield, Inc. company employs more people globally than Thiessen Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Thiessen Communications nor Marfield, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Thiessen Communications nor Marfield, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Thiessen Communications nor Marfield, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Thiessen Communications nor Marfield, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Thiessen Communications nor Marfield, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Thiessen Communications nor Marfield, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N