Comparison Overview

The University of Texas at Austin

VS

School of Visual Arts

The University of Texas at Austin

1 University Station, Austin, TX, US, 78712
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 800 and 849

The University of Texas at Austin is one of the largest public universities in the United States. Founded in 1883, the University has grown from a single building, eight teachers, two departments and 221 students to a 350-acre main campus with 21,000 faculty and staff, 16 colleges and schools and more than 50,000 students.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 26,129
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

School of Visual Arts

209 East 23rd Street, New York, ny, US, 10010
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

School of Visual Arts has been a leader in the education of artists, designers, and creative professionals for more than seven decades. With a faculty of distinguished working professionals, a dynamic curriculum, and an emphasis on critical thinking, SVA is a catalyst for innovation and social responsibility. Comprising 6,000 students at its Manhattan campus and over 43,000 alumni from some 130 countries, SVA also represents one of the most influential artistic communities in the world. For information about the College’s 30 undergraduate and graduate degree programs, visit sva.edu.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 18,375
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theuniversityoftexasataustin-.jpeg
The University of Texas at Austin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/svanyc.jpeg
School of Visual Arts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The University of Texas at Austin
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
School of Visual Arts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Texas at Austin in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for School of Visual Arts in 2026.

Incident History — The University of Texas at Austin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Texas at Austin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — School of Visual Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

School of Visual Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theuniversityoftexasataustin-.jpeg
The University of Texas at Austin
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/svanyc.jpeg
School of Visual Arts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The University of Texas at Austin company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to School of Visual Arts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, School of Visual Arts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The University of Texas at Austin company.

In the current year, School of Visual Arts company and The University of Texas at Austin company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither School of Visual Arts company nor The University of Texas at Austin company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither School of Visual Arts company nor The University of Texas at Austin company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither School of Visual Arts company nor The University of Texas at Austin company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The University of Texas at Austin company nor School of Visual Arts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The University of Texas at Austin nor School of Visual Arts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both School of Visual Arts company and The University of Texas at Austin company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

The University of Texas at Austin company employs more people globally than School of Visual Arts company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither The University of Texas at Austin nor School of Visual Arts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The University of Texas at Austin nor School of Visual Arts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The University of Texas at Austin nor School of Visual Arts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The University of Texas at Austin nor School of Visual Arts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The University of Texas at Austin nor School of Visual Arts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The University of Texas at Austin nor School of Visual Arts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.