Comparison Overview

The Standard Group

VS

Xpress Labels Limited

The Standard Group

433 Pearl Street, Reading, PA, 19602, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.standardgroup.com

The Standard Group is a premier print management and marketing logistic company. We simplify the art of communication for our customers by understanding their business and delivering the right message to the marketplace. We partner with our customers to streamline and automate processes, facilitate ordering, improve quality, manage inventory and reduce obsolescence. And by leveraging innovative technologies, we execute multi-channel communication strategies to reach audience, drive engagement, increase revenue, reduce cost and raise compliance. Our award-winning works with digital and print communication, personalized messaging, online ordering, 1:1 marketing technologies and marketing automation serve a unique and varied client base ranging from small non-profit organizations to large Fortune 500 companies. We specialize in: • Commercial Print & Packaging • Medical Printing • Marketing Management and Automation • Personalized Communication & Variable Data • Promotional Products • Warehousing & Fulfillment • Direct Mail

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 236
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Xpress Labels Limited

Anglo Business Park, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP19 8UP, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.xpresslabels.com

Xpress Labels is an innovative self adhesive label manufacturing company located in Aylesbury Buckinghamshire, that can deliver a world class solution for any labelling requirement. Since our incorporation in 2000 our continued growth has been built on our reputation for supplying our customers on time, in full, every time, We pride ourselves on our exceptional quality, superior customer service and sensible lead times. Xpress has now concluded our capex programme for 2018 that has seen us upgrade our printing, pre-press and finishing equipment – this complementing our existing flexo and digital (inkjet) capabilities. In support of these investments we are also implementing a closed loop colour control standard with additional investment in the latest anilox cleaning, ink mixing/dispensing and colour certification software and hardware. This combined with our use of the Kodak NX plate and Apex GTT anilox technology will allow us to provide our customers with the highest quality print regardless of their requirements.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thestandardgroup.jpeg
The Standard Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xpress-labels.jpeg
Xpress Labels Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Standard Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Xpress Labels Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Standard Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xpress Labels Limited in 2025.

Incident History — The Standard Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Standard Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Xpress Labels Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xpress Labels Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thestandardgroup.jpeg
The Standard Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xpress-labels.jpeg
Xpress Labels Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Standard Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Xpress Labels Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Xpress Labels Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Standard Group company.

In the current year, Xpress Labels Limited company and The Standard Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Xpress Labels Limited company nor The Standard Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Xpress Labels Limited company nor The Standard Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Xpress Labels Limited company nor The Standard Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Standard Group company nor Xpress Labels Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Standard Group nor Xpress Labels Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Standard Group company nor Xpress Labels Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Standard Group company employs more people globally than Xpress Labels Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither The Standard Group nor Xpress Labels Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Standard Group nor Xpress Labels Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Standard Group nor Xpress Labels Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Standard Group nor Xpress Labels Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Standard Group nor Xpress Labels Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Standard Group nor Xpress Labels Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References