Comparison Overview

Therapeutic Alliance LLC

VS

Black Dog Institute

Therapeutic Alliance LLC

10535 Crestwood Dr, Manassas, 20109, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Therapeutic Alliance is a provider of home-based and outpatient counseling services to individuals and families, specializing in multicultural counseling services. Therapeutic Alliance specializes in providing culturally competent counseling services to diverse populations. The staff at Therapeutic Alliance is very diverse in its own right. Many disciplines are represented by our licensed professionals, clinicians, and workers, including but not limited to the following: Psychology, Social Work, Sociology, Marriage and Family Counseling/Therapy, Human Services Counseling, Family and Child Studies, and Applied Behavior Analysis. Many staff members are certified and/or specialize in certain categories of the social disciplines mentioned above. For example, select Therapeutic Alliance staff members specialize in the following areas (not an exhaustive list): Substance Abuse Counseling; Migration and Refugee Resettlement; Domestic Violence; International Social Development.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Black Dog Institute

Hospital Road, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, AU, 2031
Last Update: 2026-01-22

As the only medical research institute in Australia to investigate mental health across the lifespan, our aim is to create a mentally healthier world for everyone through innovations in science, education, clinical service, public policy and knowledge translation. Our areas of strength include suicide prevention, digital mental health, workplace mental health, new treatments, and prevention in young people. Our unique translational approach allows us to quickly turn our world-class scientific findings into clinical services, educational programs and e-health products that improve the lives of people with mental illness. We join the dots, connecting research answers, expert knowledge and the voices of lived experience to deliver solutions that work across the health care system for patients and practitioners alike. Our partnerships with people with lived experience, federal, state, and local governments, communities, schools, workplaces, philanthropists, health services, clinicians, and others in the mental health sector enables us to create real-world change.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 421
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/therapeutic-alliance-llc.jpeg
Therapeutic Alliance LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blackdoginst.jpeg
Black Dog Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Therapeutic Alliance LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Black Dog Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Therapeutic Alliance LLC in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Black Dog Institute in 2026.

Incident History — Therapeutic Alliance LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Therapeutic Alliance LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Black Dog Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Black Dog Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/therapeutic-alliance-llc.jpeg
Therapeutic Alliance LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blackdoginst.jpeg
Black Dog Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Black Dog Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Therapeutic Alliance LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Black Dog Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Therapeutic Alliance LLC company.

In the current year, Black Dog Institute company and Therapeutic Alliance LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Black Dog Institute company nor Therapeutic Alliance LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Black Dog Institute company nor Therapeutic Alliance LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Black Dog Institute company nor Therapeutic Alliance LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Therapeutic Alliance LLC company nor Black Dog Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Therapeutic Alliance LLC nor Black Dog Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Therapeutic Alliance LLC company nor Black Dog Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Black Dog Institute company employs more people globally than Therapeutic Alliance LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Therapeutic Alliance LLC nor Black Dog Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Therapeutic Alliance LLC nor Black Dog Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Therapeutic Alliance LLC nor Black Dog Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Therapeutic Alliance LLC nor Black Dog Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Therapeutic Alliance LLC nor Black Dog Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Therapeutic Alliance LLC nor Black Dog Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N