Comparison Overview

The Meadows Ranch

VS

Seabrook Rehab

The Meadows Ranch

5535 N Vulture Mine Rd, Wickenburg, Arizona, 85390, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Meadows Ranch provides a specialized approach that combines proven medical and integrated trauma services for the highest level of eating disorder treatment possible. We offer critical care/inpatient, residential, and partial hospitalization levels of care for girls aged 8-17 and adult women on a scenic ranch property in Wickenburg, Arizona. More than 10,000 patients have trusted their care to The Meadows Ranch. Why? Because our treatment works.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 113
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Seabrook Rehab

133 Polk Lane, Bridgeton, 08302, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Seabrook is a renowned network of behavioral health facilities providing treatment for alcoholism, drug addiction and co-occurring disorders to families located primarily in the northeastern United States. Our programs apply evidenced-based practices including both behavioral therapies and pharmacotherapies including buprenorphine. Behavioral therapies include cognitive - behavioral, motivational enhancement, family therapy, multi-systemic therapy and 12 step facilitation. Our main inpatient rehab facility is located in rural Bridgeton, New Jersey (NJ), providing detox, residential rehab, long term rehab, sober living and outpatient services. In addition, Seabrook operates 3 additional outpatient facilities in Cherry Hill, NJ, Shrewsbury, NJ, Morristown, NJ. All programs are licensed and accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) If you are seeking treatment for yourself or a loved one, call today for your no-cost assessment! An admissions counselor is awaiting your phone call and will be with you every step of the way to ensure that you and your loved ones get the quality addiction treatment they need and deserve.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 146
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/themeadowsranch.jpeg
The Meadows Ranch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seabrookrehab.jpeg
Seabrook Rehab
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Meadows Ranch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seabrook Rehab
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Meadows Ranch in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seabrook Rehab in 2026.

Incident History — The Meadows Ranch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Meadows Ranch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seabrook Rehab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seabrook Rehab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/themeadowsranch.jpeg
The Meadows Ranch
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seabrookrehab.jpeg
Seabrook Rehab
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Email Accounts
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both The Meadows Ranch company and Seabrook Rehab company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Seabrook Rehab company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The Meadows Ranch company has not reported any.

In the current year, Seabrook Rehab company and The Meadows Ranch company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seabrook Rehab company nor The Meadows Ranch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Seabrook Rehab company has disclosed at least one data breach, while The Meadows Ranch company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Seabrook Rehab company nor The Meadows Ranch company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Meadows Ranch company nor Seabrook Rehab company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Meadows Ranch nor Seabrook Rehab holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Seabrook Rehab company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Meadows Ranch company.

Seabrook Rehab company employs more people globally than The Meadows Ranch company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither The Meadows Ranch nor Seabrook Rehab holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Meadows Ranch nor Seabrook Rehab holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Meadows Ranch nor Seabrook Rehab holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Meadows Ranch nor Seabrook Rehab holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Meadows Ranch nor Seabrook Rehab holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Meadows Ranch nor Seabrook Rehab holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N