Comparison Overview

International

VS

FORVIA

International

2701 Navistar Drive, None, Lisle, Illinois , US, 60532
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.international.com

We build International trucks and engines and IC Bus® school and commercial buses that are as tough and as smart as the people who drive them. Our solutions deliver greater uptime and productivity to fleets across North America. We also develop Fleetrite® aftermarket parts. In everything we do, our vision is to accelerate the impact of sustainable mobility to create the cleaner, safer world we all deserve. We are part of the TRATON Group, one of the world's leading commercial vehicle manufacturers.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 10,628
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

FORVIA

None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.forvia.com

FORVIA comprises the complementary technology and industrial strengths of Faurecia and HELLA. With over 300 industrial sites and 77 R&D centers, 150,000 people, including more than 35,000 engineers across 40+ countries, FORVIA provides a unique and comprehensive approach to the automotive challenges of today and tomorrow. Composed of 6 business groups with 24 product lines, and a strong IP portfolio of over 15,000 patents, FORVIA is focused on becoming the preferred innovation and integration partner for OEMS worldwide. FORVIA aims to be a change maker committed to foreseeing and making the mobility transformation happen.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 56,528
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theinternationalmotors.jpeg
International
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forvia.jpeg
FORVIA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FORVIA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FORVIA in 2025.

Incident History — International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FORVIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FORVIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theinternationalmotors.jpeg
International
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forvia.jpeg
FORVIA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FORVIA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

International company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas FORVIA company has not reported any.

In the current year, FORVIA company and International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FORVIA company nor International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

International company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other FORVIA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither FORVIA company nor International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither International company nor FORVIA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither International nor FORVIA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both FORVIA company and International company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

FORVIA company employs more people globally than International company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither International nor FORVIA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither International nor FORVIA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither International nor FORVIA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither International nor FORVIA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither International nor FORVIA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither International nor FORVIA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References