Comparison Overview

The Insurer

VS

OnPoint Specialty Products

The Insurer

WeWork Bishopsgate, 15 Bishopsgate, London, England, EC2N 3AR, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

At The Insurer, we bring you the market-leading specialty (re)insurance news, analysis and data service. Our scope is global but our focus is on underwriting and distribution in the area of complex risk, and the capital, infrastructure and services that support it. We believe in producing trusted and accurate news, analytics and intelligence on the global (re)insurance markets from our three editorial hubs: London, New York and Los Angeles. We are committed to providing the industry’s professionals and investors with a single information resource focused on expert coverage and deep-dive analysis in key markets, including: - NA commercial and E&S - Lloyd’s and London market - Bermuda, Zurich, Singapore - European and global (re)insurance - Retro and ILS - Live and legacy - All major US and global specialty/commercial classes Our mission is to dig beneath the surface of the industry and bring you insights and market intelligence that might not be available elsewhere. But we will also serve as the industry’s advocate. That means we will provide a voice for those wishing to highlight good and bad within the industry, as well as the challenges and opportunities it faces from external forces. Above all we strive to deliver responsible, relevant and insightful journalism to our readership, as well as meaningful analysis and valuable data. In less than eighteen months, we have become the industry’s fastest-growing publication with over 18,000 full subscribers from around the world. If you haven’t yet joined them, why not try us out? Make sure to follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/_theinsurer

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

OnPoint Specialty Products

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

OnPoint Specialty Products, now in its 30th year of providing innovative merchandising solutions to customers, has evolved from a simple idea of offering the best in creative services and products to the publishing and souvenir marketplace. Bill Miko, President at OnPoint, states, “We have an experienced team of creative professionals providing graphic design and product development services to meet your most exact merchandising needs. Whatever your specific goals, we have the resources necessary to design and deliver exciting and unique products to help you accomplish these objectives.” A division of the McCormick Armstrong family, OnPoint has the ability to expand our array of customer services by including a full range of finishing, marketing, and fulfillment services. In addition, as part of our International Print Alliance, OnPoint can provide you with a cost-effective means to manufacture even the most complex projects. Our experienced importing and shipping staff will provide all the tools necessary to accomplish seamless overseas product manufacturing. OnPoint’s library of stock merchandise is continually expanding as we research and identify new products that have promising market potential. Many of our clients utilize these items in conjunction with custom products to develop their own sales and merchandising strategies. These products provide an excellent opportunity to test your specific merchandising possibilities. As many of our long time clients will attest, this is a great way to increase sales while controlling inventory. If you have any questions or need assistance in creating a program to fit your specific needs, please contact Joe Luman in our sales department at [email protected], or visit our Web site at www.onpointproducts.com.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theinsurer.jpeg
The Insurer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onpoint-specialty-products.jpeg
OnPoint Specialty Products
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Insurer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OnPoint Specialty Products
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Insurer in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OnPoint Specialty Products in 2025.

Incident History — The Insurer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Insurer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OnPoint Specialty Products (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OnPoint Specialty Products cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theinsurer.jpeg
The Insurer
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onpoint-specialty-products.jpeg
OnPoint Specialty Products
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

OnPoint Specialty Products company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Insurer company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, OnPoint Specialty Products company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Insurer company.

In the current year, OnPoint Specialty Products company and The Insurer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OnPoint Specialty Products company nor The Insurer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OnPoint Specialty Products company nor The Insurer company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OnPoint Specialty Products company nor The Insurer company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Insurer company nor OnPoint Specialty Products company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Insurer nor OnPoint Specialty Products holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Insurer company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to OnPoint Specialty Products company.

The Insurer company employs more people globally than OnPoint Specialty Products company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The Insurer nor OnPoint Specialty Products holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Insurer nor OnPoint Specialty Products holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Insurer nor OnPoint Specialty Products holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Insurer nor OnPoint Specialty Products holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Insurer nor OnPoint Specialty Products holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Insurer nor OnPoint Specialty Products holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.