Comparison Overview

The Future Laboratory

VS

Cebr

The Future Laboratory

6 Orsman Road, London, N1 5RA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02

We inspire and future-proof organisations The Future Laboratory is one of the world’s most renowned futures consultancies. With a unique blend of trend forecasting, consumer insight, brand strategy and innovation, we inspire and future-proof organisations. We help you to harness market trends, understand and adapt to emerging consumer needs, position your brand for success and keep you ahead of competitors. We give you the confidence to make the right decisions and investments to survive and thrive in the future by inspiring innovation, helping to manage risk and focus on the initiatives that will lead to profitable growth. Since 2001, we have helped to shape the future of more than 1,000 brands in 37 countries.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cebr

Unit 1 4 Bath Street, London, undefined, EC1V 9DX, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

The Centre for Economics and Business Research is one of the UK's leading economics consultancies. We use economics and econometrics, surveys, qualitative research, expert interviews, modelling and scenario planning to help our clients understand their environment, forecast changes in it, build robust strategies and persuade others.As a recognised independent forecasting house, our top-line predictions for the United Kingdom are published by the Treasury and used in the Bank of England’s quarterly inflation report. We are innovative and our approach is unashamedly quantitative; our advice is supported by thorough numerical analysis. We challenge conventional wisdom and have the courage to tell clients what we believe is right, and not just what they want to hear. We are proud of our abilities to communicate at all levels and with all audiences, and to influence others’ decisions.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thefuturelaboratory.jpeg
The Future Laboratory
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cebr.jpeg
Cebr
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Future Laboratory
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cebr
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Future Laboratory in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cebr in 2025.

Incident History — The Future Laboratory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Future Laboratory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cebr (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cebr cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thefuturelaboratory.jpeg
The Future Laboratory
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cebr.jpeg
Cebr
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Future Laboratory company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cebr company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cebr company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Future Laboratory company.

In the current year, Cebr company and The Future Laboratory company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cebr company nor The Future Laboratory company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cebr company nor The Future Laboratory company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cebr company nor The Future Laboratory company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Future Laboratory company nor Cebr company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Future Laboratory nor Cebr holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Future Laboratory company nor Cebr company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Future Laboratory company employs more people globally than Cebr company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither The Future Laboratory nor Cebr holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Future Laboratory nor Cebr holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Future Laboratory nor Cebr holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Future Laboratory nor Cebr holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Future Laboratory nor Cebr holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Future Laboratory nor Cebr holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X