Comparison Overview

The Field

VS

Music in Common, Inc.

The Field

2​2​8 P​a​r​k A​v​e S, New York, NY, 10003, US
Last Update: 2025-12-15
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://thefield.org/

The Field envisions a world where artists are abundantly and holistically prosperous. We’re building a community that connects, empowers, and elevates creative practitioners of all kinds. Whether you’re a writer, dancer, filmmaker, musician, actor, or a creative individual, there’s a place for you at The Field. Founded by artists for artists, our organization has provided fiscal sponsorship and fundraising support to thousands of independent artists and small arts organizations nationwide to get their projects off the ground. Through hands-on fundraising assistance, entrepreneurial capacity-building, and skill-building workshops, we are removing barriers and working to ensure that artists can prosper in all areas of their lives.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Music in Common, Inc.

PO Box 1190, Sheffield, MA, 01257, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.musicincommon.org

Music In Common is a non-profit organization empowering youth and communities against hate through collaborative songwriting, multimedia, and performance. Our programs bring together teens and young adults from diverse backgrounds to discover and celebrate their common ground. Since 2005, Music In Common has directly served thousands of people in more than 300 communities across the globe and across religious, ethnic, cultural, and racial sectors. In any community, our programs can transform apprehension into trust, fear into acceptance, powerlessness into action. Working together face to face, participants expand understanding, build confidence, strengthen community, wage peace and - yes - change the world. This is done through our programs: JAMMS, Amplify, and FODfest.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thefieldnyc.jpeg
The Field
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/music-in-common-inc-.jpeg
Music in Common, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Field
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Music in Common, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Field in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Music in Common, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — The Field (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Field cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Music in Common, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Music in Common, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thefieldnyc.jpeg
The Field
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/music-in-common-inc-.jpeg
Music in Common, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Field company and Music in Common, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Music in Common, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Field company.

In the current year, Music in Common, Inc. company and The Field company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Music in Common, Inc. company nor The Field company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Music in Common, Inc. company nor The Field company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Music in Common, Inc. company nor The Field company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Field company nor Music in Common, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Field nor Music in Common, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Field company nor Music in Common, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Field company employs more people globally than Music in Common, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither The Field nor Music in Common, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Field nor Music in Common, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Field nor Music in Common, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Field nor Music in Common, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Field nor Music in Common, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Field nor Music in Common, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References