Comparison Overview

The Dot Corp

VS

Davis GCS

The Dot Corp

2424 Mcgaw Avenue, Irvine, CA, 92614, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thedotcorp.com

Something amazing happens when you connect the dots. Ideas merge. Solutions become integrated. And images come to fruition. Welcome to Dot Connect, where you’ll discover that our wide range of services, renowned consistency, acknowledged sustainability, streamlined and effective workflow and unparalleled attention to detail are just a few of the reasons our clients refuse to go anywhere else. We offer a broad base of services: • Printing services • Digital solutions and apps • Direct mail and marketing • Fulfillment & Distribution • Retail and trade show display and banners These five pillars are more than just turnkey solutions. It’s our ability to problem solve that’s become our hallmark. We have seasoned, knowledgeable and passionate experts who have deep experience across all business channels—from concept to execution. Because the way we see it, once you connect, anything is possible

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 121
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Davis GCS

101 East Robinson Avenue, Barberton, OH, 44203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://DavisGCS.com

Commercial sheetfed printer offering complete Graphic Communication Solutions. 104 years of dedicated service and thoughtful performance in the Graphic Arts Industry. Specializing in printing on traditional and synthetic substrates, complete finishing and mailing services all performed in house. Also offering Advertising Specialties/Promotional Products at competative rates. Davis GCS is best know for their speed and ability to produce in the absolute tightest of deadlines.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thedotcorp.jpeg
The Dot Corp
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davis-printing-company.jpeg
Davis GCS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Dot Corp
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Davis GCS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Dot Corp in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Davis GCS in 2025.

Incident History — The Dot Corp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Dot Corp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Davis GCS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Davis GCS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thedotcorp.jpeg
The Dot Corp
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davis-printing-company.jpeg
Davis GCS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Davis GCS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Dot Corp company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Davis GCS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Dot Corp company.

In the current year, Davis GCS company and The Dot Corp company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Davis GCS company nor The Dot Corp company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Davis GCS company nor The Dot Corp company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Davis GCS company nor The Dot Corp company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Dot Corp company nor Davis GCS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Dot Corp nor Davis GCS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Dot Corp company nor Davis GCS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Dot Corp company employs more people globally than Davis GCS company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither The Dot Corp nor Davis GCS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Dot Corp nor Davis GCS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Dot Corp nor Davis GCS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Dot Corp nor Davis GCS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Dot Corp nor Davis GCS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Dot Corp nor Davis GCS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References