Comparison Overview

The Corydon Group, LLC

VS

Athena Partners Strategy Group

The Corydon Group, LLC

125 W. Market Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN, US, 46204
Last Update: 2025-12-13

The Corydon Group, LLC is a full-service public affairs firm which provides knowledgeable, experienced and professional guidance for organizations that need help navigating the sometimes complicated processes of state government. We excel at lobbying, advocacy, strategic communications, grassroots campaigning, association management, and procurement. The Corydon Group has nearly 200 years of combined professional experience in and around government at the federal, state, and local levels. For more information about our services, please send an inquiry to [email protected].

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Athena Partners Strategy Group

Anaheim, California, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Athena’s exclusive focus on parking technology delivers unmatched insight and results, proven by hundreds of success stories from industry leaders who have transformed their operations with our expertise. As a premier technology representation and consultancy, APSG leverages a specialized network of partners to guide organizations in developing new business and launching innovative solutions across parking, transportation, curb management, rideshare, law enforcement, public safety, and EV charging sectors. Learn more at athenapsg.com. We offer over 100 years of combined industry experience in: ✔ Parking and parking enforcement ✔ Transportation and mobility ✔ Curb management and rideshare ✔ Law enforcement and public safety ✔ EV Charging and infrastructure Want to learn more about Athena Partners Strategy Group Representation? Contact us today!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thecorydongroup.jpeg
The Corydon Group, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/athenapsg.jpeg
Athena Partners Strategy Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Corydon Group, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Athena Partners Strategy Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Corydon Group, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Athena Partners Strategy Group in 2025.

Incident History — The Corydon Group, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Corydon Group, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Athena Partners Strategy Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Athena Partners Strategy Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thecorydongroup.jpeg
The Corydon Group, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/athenapsg.jpeg
Athena Partners Strategy Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Corydon Group, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Athena Partners Strategy Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Athena Partners Strategy Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Corydon Group, LLC company.

In the current year, Athena Partners Strategy Group company and The Corydon Group, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group company nor The Corydon Group, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group company nor The Corydon Group, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Athena Partners Strategy Group company nor The Corydon Group, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Corydon Group, LLC company nor Athena Partners Strategy Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Corydon Group, LLC nor Athena Partners Strategy Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Corydon Group, LLC company nor Athena Partners Strategy Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Corydon Group, LLC company employs more people globally than Athena Partners Strategy Group company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither The Corydon Group, LLC nor Athena Partners Strategy Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Corydon Group, LLC nor Athena Partners Strategy Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Corydon Group, LLC nor Athena Partners Strategy Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Corydon Group, LLC nor Athena Partners Strategy Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Corydon Group, LLC nor Athena Partners Strategy Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Corydon Group, LLC nor Athena Partners Strategy Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N