Comparison Overview

The Bananaland

VS

Simplify Branding

The Bananaland

162 Elm St., Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06604, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

We are a team that is highly dedicated to our craft, seasoned with experience, and here to ensure an enjoyable experience throughout your stay. We will also make sure that you feel refreshed, invigorated, and ready to take on the world. So sit back, relax, and sip on a banana daiquiri while we give that company of yours a tan.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Simplify Branding

21 Pear Tree Stree, London, EC1V 3AP, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01

I have over 30 years’ experience as a graphic designer and brand developer. I specialise in the design, management and production of brand identity, corporate literature and brand development systems. I have a wide and varied portfolio which spans the leisure and communications sectors as well as energy, retail and property. I can help companies, large and small, to develop their logo and brand identities and create any associated collateral such as website design, video and animation, eMarketing and online brochures. I ran my own business in London for over 20 years. I now use my creative flair to great effect in originating and developing highly targetted brand solutions, from my studio in Devon.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thebananaland.jpeg
The Bananaland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/simplify-branding.jpeg
Simplify Branding
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Bananaland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Simplify Branding
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Bananaland in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Simplify Branding in 2025.

Incident History — The Bananaland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Bananaland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Simplify Branding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Simplify Branding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thebananaland.jpeg
The Bananaland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/simplify-branding.jpeg
Simplify Branding
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Bananaland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Simplify Branding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Simplify Branding company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Bananaland company.

In the current year, Simplify Branding company and The Bananaland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Simplify Branding company nor The Bananaland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Simplify Branding company nor The Bananaland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Simplify Branding company nor The Bananaland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Bananaland company nor Simplify Branding company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Bananaland nor Simplify Branding holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Bananaland company nor Simplify Branding company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Bananaland company employs more people globally than Simplify Branding company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither The Bananaland nor Simplify Branding holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Bananaland nor Simplify Branding holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Bananaland nor Simplify Branding holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Bananaland nor Simplify Branding holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Bananaland nor Simplify Branding holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Bananaland nor Simplify Branding holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X