Comparison Overview

The Bananaland

VS

DesignLab

The Bananaland

162 Elm St., Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06604, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://thebananaland.com

We are a team that is highly dedicated to our craft, seasoned with experience, and here to ensure an enjoyable experience throughout your stay. We will also make sure that you feel refreshed, invigorated, and ready to take on the world. So sit back, relax, and sip on a banana daiquiri while we give that company of yours a tan.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

DesignLab

134a The Parade, Norwood, South Australia, 5067, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
http://designlab.net.au

Brand design are as individual as fingerprints. They need to be. Tailored to each client to create a unique ‘personality’. Our work – showcased here – is the result of partnership. Each example the result of the client collaboration that ensures our best work. Distinctive, effective solutions that speak for themselves. Read what each client says about this ‘chemistry’. We call it ‘creativity that connects’ – you with your clients. If you trust your design assignment to DesignLab we’ll work with you as much as for you. Hopefully the result will knock your – and your customers’ – socks off! We work with every one of our clients to develop and grow new and inspiring brands and refresh existing ones. Creating unique and individual visual identity. We hope that fresh approach to each client’s needs is demonstrated here in this showcase of our graphic design work. Our aim is always to better connect you with your customers at every moment of visual interaction. Judge us by the company we keep. We actually don’t much like talking about ourselves. We’d rather let our work do the talking and believe it’s much more important to hear what our clients say about their experiences with DesignLab. In essence, our clients find the experience enjoyable – they actually like working with us. We believe it’s our ability to ‘get along’ with people that keeps them coming back and recommending us to others. We really do value every client partnership. That chemistry helps us produce the design creativity that connects – you with your clients. Find out for yourself. Meet us to discover how we could work together – collaborate – in finding the design solution that’s right for you.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thebananaland.jpeg
The Bananaland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/designlab.net.au.jpeg
DesignLab
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Bananaland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DesignLab
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Bananaland in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DesignLab in 2025.

Incident History — The Bananaland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Bananaland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DesignLab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DesignLab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thebananaland.jpeg
The Bananaland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/designlab.net.au.jpeg
DesignLab
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Bananaland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DesignLab company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DesignLab company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Bananaland company.

In the current year, DesignLab company and The Bananaland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DesignLab company nor The Bananaland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DesignLab company nor The Bananaland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DesignLab company nor The Bananaland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Bananaland company nor DesignLab company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Bananaland nor DesignLab holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Bananaland company nor DesignLab company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DesignLab company employs more people globally than The Bananaland company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither The Bananaland nor DesignLab holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Bananaland nor DesignLab holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Bananaland nor DesignLab holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Bananaland nor DesignLab holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Bananaland nor DesignLab holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Bananaland nor DesignLab holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References