Comparison Overview

Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds

VS

Matchbook Productions

Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds

Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds, Bury St Edmunds, IP33 1QR, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds is one of Britain's most significant theatre buildings and the last surviving Regency playhouse in the country. Built in 1819 and restored to its Regency origins, this intimate Grade 1 listed building is the only theatre in the National Trust property portfolio. The Theatre presents a vibrant, year-round programme of drama, music, dance and comedy, featuring many of this country’s leading companies and performers. It has built it's reputation by producing quality dramas and productions including the ever popular annual pantomime. Alongside our on-stage programme of shows, the Theatre offers a wide-ranging educational and community-based programme of activities and opportunities to engage people from 5 – 105 years of age. With many of its original features still intact, it is a superb example of a Regency playhouse and one of the most beautiful, intimate and historic theatres in the world. This Regency jewel was designed and built in 1819 by William Wilkins.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Matchbook Productions

11104, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Matchbook Productions creates new and innovative theatrical productions through the marriage of traditional theatre with the aerial arts. By taking to the air, we utilize dimensions typically neglected by conventional stage performances, thus opening a new realm of possibilities for ourselves and for our audiences. By mixing the established with the cutting-edge we offer both new and seasoned theatre goers rare and original experiences that challenge preconceptions, and expand the imagination. We are fiscally sponsored through The Field. www.thefield.org

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theatre-royal-bury-st-edmunds.jpeg
Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Matchbook Productions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Matchbook Productions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Matchbook Productions in 2025.

Incident History — Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Matchbook Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Matchbook Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theatre-royal-bury-st-edmunds.jpeg
Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Matchbook Productions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Matchbook Productions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Matchbook Productions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds company.

In the current year, Matchbook Productions company and Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Matchbook Productions company nor Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Matchbook Productions company nor Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Matchbook Productions company nor Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds company nor Matchbook Productions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds nor Matchbook Productions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds company nor Matchbook Productions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds company employs more people globally than Matchbook Productions company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds nor Matchbook Productions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds nor Matchbook Productions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds nor Matchbook Productions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds nor Matchbook Productions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds nor Matchbook Productions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds nor Matchbook Productions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N