Comparison Overview

Theatre Bristol

VS

Perform Australia

Theatre Bristol

82-84 York Road, Bristol, BS3 4AL, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

We exist to support and improve live performance, to make it fairer, more equal and inclusive. We believe in the power of connecting people, sharing knowledge and resources, brokering relationships and advocating for best practice. Through this work we play a vital role in developing the live performance ecology of Bristol and the wider South West. Our vision is for live performance and performance makers to thrive; to be valued, resilient, and deeply connected to more people’s lives. We are here to up theatre’s game.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Perform Australia

2A Barker St, Griffith, ACT, AU, 2603
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Perform Australia is one of Australia's leading drama schools and is committed to the development of local talent for stage and screen. We also believe strongly in the value of participation in dramatic art for pleasure and personal growth. Whether you're looking to develop your skills as an actor, public speaker or simply dabble in the art of performance for your own enjoyment, Perform Australia can provide training for your needs.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theatre-bristol.jpeg
Theatre Bristol
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/performaustralia.jpeg
Perform Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Theatre Bristol
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Perform Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Theatre Bristol in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Perform Australia in 2025.

Incident History — Theatre Bristol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Theatre Bristol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Perform Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Perform Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theatre-bristol.jpeg
Theatre Bristol
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/performaustralia.jpeg
Perform Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Perform Australia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Theatre Bristol company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Perform Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Theatre Bristol company.

In the current year, Perform Australia company and Theatre Bristol company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Perform Australia company nor Theatre Bristol company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Perform Australia company nor Theatre Bristol company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Perform Australia company nor Theatre Bristol company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Theatre Bristol company nor Perform Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Theatre Bristol nor Perform Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Theatre Bristol company nor Perform Australia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Perform Australia company employs more people globally than Theatre Bristol company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Theatre Bristol nor Perform Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Theatre Bristol nor Perform Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Theatre Bristol nor Perform Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Theatre Bristol nor Perform Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Theatre Bristol nor Perform Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Theatre Bristol nor Perform Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N