Comparison Overview

Alpha

VS

Screenflex Room Dividers

Alpha

53 Dargan Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT3 9JU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.alphayourspace.com

Across our offices in Ireland and the UK, we combine our collective expertise as a partnership focused on delivering furniture, design and space planning solutions cohesively and with flair. We are collaborators, committed to working in partnership with architects, designers, clients, and trade partners. We have worked across all sectors and can apply the world’s leading products with cutting edge thinking to create a bespoke solution for your specific needs. Whether it is an office, showroom, classroom or venue, our track record and the calibre of our people are your assurance that Alpha is the right partner for you.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Screenflex Room Dividers

585 Capital Drive, Lake Zurich, 60047, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799
https://www.screenflex.com/

Simple solutions to maximize your space ~ Screenflex is the premier manufacturer of high quality sound absorbing, fabric covered portable room divider panel systems and display towers, and the trusted supplier among facility managers across all industries. American made Screenflex products are known for their innovative design, quality construction and adherence to the highest standards of workmanship. Simply roll them into place and open to create any configuration you desire. GSA approved.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thealphagroup.jpeg
Alpha
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/screenflex-room-dividers.jpeg
Screenflex Room Dividers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alpha
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Screenflex Room Dividers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alpha in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Screenflex Room Dividers in 2025.

Incident History — Alpha (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alpha cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Screenflex Room Dividers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Screenflex Room Dividers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thealphagroup.jpeg
Alpha
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/screenflex-room-dividers.jpeg
Screenflex Room Dividers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Alpha company and Screenflex Room Dividers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Screenflex Room Dividers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alpha company.

In the current year, Screenflex Room Dividers company and Alpha company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Screenflex Room Dividers company nor Alpha company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Screenflex Room Dividers company nor Alpha company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Screenflex Room Dividers company nor Alpha company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alpha company nor Screenflex Room Dividers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alpha nor Screenflex Room Dividers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Alpha company nor Screenflex Room Dividers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Alpha company employs more people globally than Screenflex Room Dividers company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Alpha nor Screenflex Room Dividers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alpha nor Screenflex Room Dividers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alpha nor Screenflex Room Dividers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alpha nor Screenflex Room Dividers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alpha nor Screenflex Room Dividers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alpha nor Screenflex Room Dividers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References