Comparison Overview

The WrightGUARD

VS

Denver Athletic

The WrightGUARD

8201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

TWG Sports/The WrightGuard is a start-up Sports Safety Equipment company in the Washington ,DC area. We are the makers of the premiere patent pending product TWG The WrightGuard athletic mouthguard. Our mouthguard's design ensures consistent proper placement and uniform thickness of shock absorbing material for protection. Our story began as a desire to help better protect the many athletes we treated in our local dental practice ranging from NFL pros to young collegiate ,middle and high school athletes. TWG saw a deficit in what is currently on the market and had researched, designed and applied dental principals to develop a patent pending product that is custom dental office quality yet inexpensive for the masses. Subsequently we have formed relationships with many pro athletes, retired athletes, athletic directors, coaches , colleges and university athletic programs .

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Denver Athletic

3101 S Platte River Dr, Englewood, Colorado, 80110-2138, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Denver Athletic, Colorado's premier team dealer, has been family owned and operated for +35 years. We partner with schools, teams, leagues, and corporations from all across the state, and pride ourselves on serving marquee accounts including the Denver Broncos, Colorado Rockies, Denver Nuggets, Colorado Avalanche, Colorado Mammoth, Colorado School of Mines, and the University of Denver. We also provide our services for some of the most notable school districts and sports leagues in CO, and would love to work with you, too! Think of Denver Athletic for unique, high quality: - Athletic Uniforms - Equipment - Logo'd Apparel - Promotional products - Team Sales - Cheer and Dance Sales - Corporate Sales - Manufacturing & Design - In-house: Screen printing, embroidery, tackle twill and banners. - Top-notch customer service

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-wrightguard.jpeg
The WrightGUARD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-athletic-supply.jpeg
Denver Athletic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The WrightGUARD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Denver Athletic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The WrightGUARD in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Denver Athletic in 2025.

Incident History — The WrightGUARD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The WrightGUARD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Denver Athletic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Denver Athletic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-wrightguard.jpeg
The WrightGUARD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-athletic-supply.jpeg
Denver Athletic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The WrightGUARD company and Denver Athletic company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Denver Athletic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The WrightGUARD company.

In the current year, Denver Athletic company and The WrightGUARD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Denver Athletic company nor The WrightGUARD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Denver Athletic company nor The WrightGUARD company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Denver Athletic company nor The WrightGUARD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The WrightGUARD company nor Denver Athletic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The WrightGUARD nor Denver Athletic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The WrightGUARD company nor Denver Athletic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Denver Athletic company employs more people globally than The WrightGUARD company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither The WrightGUARD nor Denver Athletic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The WrightGUARD nor Denver Athletic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The WrightGUARD nor Denver Athletic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The WrightGUARD nor Denver Athletic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The WrightGUARD nor Denver Athletic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The WrightGUARD nor Denver Athletic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H