Comparison Overview

The Works Museum

VS

Mt. Cuba Center

The Works Museum

9740 Grand Ave S, Bloomington, MN, 55420, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.theworks.org

Our mission is to inspire the next generation of innovators, engineers, and creative problem solvers. Our exhibits, programs, and design challenges engage kids in science, technology, and engineering and make learning memorable and fun. Dreams need doing, and exploring engineering gives a child the power to make stuff, break stuff, and make it better! We need the imagination and skill of engineers to solve the problems and address the challenges of our modern world. Engineering fuels collaboration, persistence, and problem solving; critical skills for every child from every walk of life. The Works Museum welcomes you to explore engineering and stretch your imagination.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mt. Cuba Center

3120 Barley Mill Road, Hockessin, DE, 19707, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://mtcubacenter.org

Mt. Cuba Center is a botanical garden that inspires an appreciation for the beauty and value of native plants and a commitment to protect the habitats that sustain them. Over the past 70 years the gardens at Mt. Cuba Center have been transformed from fallow cornfields into thriving ecologically functional landscapes, thanks to the initiative of Mr. and Mrs. Lammot du Pont Copeland. With paths that take visitors from the formal gardens of a du Pont mansion through stunning vistas, intimate woodlands, and lush meadows, Mt. Cuba Center is a botanical garden that puts the beauty of native landscapes on display to inspire conservation. What began in the 1930s as the private estate of Mr. and Mrs. Lammot du Pont Copeland is now a public garden that centers the beauty and value of native plants. In addition to cultivating the public garden's formal and naturalistic landscapes, Mt. Cuba Center staff conduct research, connect guests to the natural world and teach students about native plant horticulture. Gardens are open for general admission Wednesday to Sunday, April to November. Classes are offered year-round.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-works-museum.jpeg
The Works Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mt--cuba-center-inc-.jpeg
Mt. Cuba Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Works Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mt. Cuba Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Works Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mt. Cuba Center in 2026.

Incident History — The Works Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Works Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mt. Cuba Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mt. Cuba Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-works-museum.jpeg
The Works Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mt--cuba-center-inc-.jpeg
Mt. Cuba Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Works Museum company and Mt. Cuba Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Mt. Cuba Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Works Museum company.

In the current year, Mt. Cuba Center company and The Works Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mt. Cuba Center company nor The Works Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mt. Cuba Center company nor The Works Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mt. Cuba Center company nor The Works Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Works Museum company nor Mt. Cuba Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Works Museum nor Mt. Cuba Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Works Museum company nor Mt. Cuba Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mt. Cuba Center company employs more people globally than The Works Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Works Museum nor Mt. Cuba Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Works Museum nor Mt. Cuba Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Works Museum nor Mt. Cuba Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Works Museum nor Mt. Cuba Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Works Museum nor Mt. Cuba Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Works Museum nor Mt. Cuba Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References