Comparison Overview

The Woodland Trust

VS

Save the Children International

The Woodland Trust

Kempton Way, Grantham, Lincolnshire, GB, NG31 6LL
Last Update: 2025-12-25

We are the UK's largest woodland conservation charity. Our vision is a world where woods and trees thrive for people and nature.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 722
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Save the Children International

30 Orange Street, London, England, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-19

Save the Children Save the Children is the world's leading independent organisation for children. We work in around 120 countries. Our vision is to live in a world in which every child attains the right to survival, protection, development and participation. Last year Save the Children's programmes and campaigns reached more than 55 million children directly around the world, through our and our partners'​ work. We work to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives. Across all of our work, we pursue several core values: accountability, ambition, collaboration, creativity and integrity.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17,224
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-woodland-trust.jpeg
The Woodland Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/save-the-children-international.jpeg
Save the Children International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Woodland Trust
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Save the Children International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Woodland Trust in 2025.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Save the Children International in 2025.

Incident History — The Woodland Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Woodland Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Save the Children International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Save the Children International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-woodland-trust.jpeg
The Woodland Trust
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/save-the-children-international.jpeg
Save the Children International
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Save the Children International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Woodland Trust company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Woodland Trust and Save the Children International have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Save the Children International company and The Woodland Trust company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Save the Children International company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while The Woodland Trust company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Save the Children International company nor The Woodland Trust company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

The Woodland Trust company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Save the Children International company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Woodland Trust company nor Save the Children International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor Save the Children International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Woodland Trust company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Save the Children International company.

Save the Children International company employs more people globally than The Woodland Trust company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor Save the Children International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor Save the Children International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor Save the Children International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor Save the Children International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor Save the Children International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor Save the Children International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 2.0.0, in self-hosted n8n instances where the Code node runs in legacy (non-task-runner) JavaScript execution mode, authenticated users with workflow editing access can invoke internal helper functions from within the Code node. This allows a workflow editor to perform actions on the n8n host with the same privileges as the n8n process, including: reading files from the host filesystem (subject to any file-access restrictions configured on the instance and OS/container permissions), and writing files to the host filesystem (subject to the same restrictions). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve limiting file operations by setting N8N_RESTRICT_FILE_ACCESS_TO to a dedicated directory (e.g., ~/.n8n-files) and ensure it contains no sensitive data, keeping N8N_BLOCK_FILE_ACCESS_TO_N8N_FILES=true (default) to block access to .n8n and user-defined config files, and disabling high-risk nodes (including the Code node) using NODES_EXCLUDE if workflow editors are not fully trusted.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving LLMs. Prior to version 0.11.1, an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in lmdeploy where torch.load() is called without the weights_only=True parameter when loading model checkpoint files. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine when they load a malicious .bin or .pt model file. This issue has been patched in version 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 1.114.0, a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability may occur in n8n when using the “Respond to Webhook” node. When this node responds with HTML content containing executable scripts, the payload may execute directly in the top-level window, rather than within the expected sandbox introduced in version 1.103.0. This behavior can enable a malicious actor with workflow creation permissions to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the n8n editor interface. This issue has been patched in version 1.114.0. Workarounds for this issue involve restricting workflow creation and modification privileges to trusted users only, avoiding use of untrusted HTML responses in the “Respond to Webhook” node, and using an external reverse proxy or HTML sanitizer to filter responses that include executable scripts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Yealink T21P_E2 Phone 52.84.0.15 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal. A remote normal privileged attacker can read arbitrary files via a crafted request result read function of the diagnostic component.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N