Comparison Overview

The Woodland Trust

VS

International Rescue Committee

The Woodland Trust

Kempton Way, Grantham, Lincolnshire, GB, NG31 6LL
Last Update: 2025-12-25

We are the UK's largest woodland conservation charity. Our vision is a world where woods and trees thrive for people and nature.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 722
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

International Rescue Committee

122 E 42st , New York, 10168, US
Last Update: 2025-12-26
Between 800 and 849

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world’s worst humanitarian crises and help people to survive, recover, and gain control of their future. Founded in 1933 at the request of Albert Einstein, the IRC offers lifesaving care and life-changing assistance to refugees and displaced people forced to flee from war or disaster. At work today in over 50+ countries and in 28 U.S. cities, the IRC restores safety, dignity and hope to millions who are uprooted and struggling to endure.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13,319
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-woodland-trust.jpeg
The Woodland Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-rescue-committee.jpeg
International Rescue Committee
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Woodland Trust
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
International Rescue Committee
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Woodland Trust in 2025.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Rescue Committee in 2025.

Incident History — The Woodland Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Woodland Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — International Rescue Committee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Rescue Committee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-woodland-trust.jpeg
The Woodland Trust
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-rescue-committee.jpeg
International Rescue Committee
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

International Rescue Committee company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Woodland Trust company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Woodland Trust company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas International Rescue Committee company has not reported any.

In the current year, International Rescue Committee company and The Woodland Trust company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither International Rescue Committee company nor The Woodland Trust company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither International Rescue Committee company nor The Woodland Trust company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

The Woodland Trust company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while International Rescue Committee company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Woodland Trust company nor International Rescue Committee company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor International Rescue Committee holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both International Rescue Committee company and The Woodland Trust company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

International Rescue Committee company employs more people globally than The Woodland Trust company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor International Rescue Committee holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor International Rescue Committee holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor International Rescue Committee holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor International Rescue Committee holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor International Rescue Committee holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Woodland Trust nor International Rescue Committee holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 2.0.0, in self-hosted n8n instances where the Code node runs in legacy (non-task-runner) JavaScript execution mode, authenticated users with workflow editing access can invoke internal helper functions from within the Code node. This allows a workflow editor to perform actions on the n8n host with the same privileges as the n8n process, including: reading files from the host filesystem (subject to any file-access restrictions configured on the instance and OS/container permissions), and writing files to the host filesystem (subject to the same restrictions). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve limiting file operations by setting N8N_RESTRICT_FILE_ACCESS_TO to a dedicated directory (e.g., ~/.n8n-files) and ensure it contains no sensitive data, keeping N8N_BLOCK_FILE_ACCESS_TO_N8N_FILES=true (default) to block access to .n8n and user-defined config files, and disabling high-risk nodes (including the Code node) using NODES_EXCLUDE if workflow editors are not fully trusted.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving LLMs. Prior to version 0.11.1, an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in lmdeploy where torch.load() is called without the weights_only=True parameter when loading model checkpoint files. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine when they load a malicious .bin or .pt model file. This issue has been patched in version 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 1.114.0, a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability may occur in n8n when using the “Respond to Webhook” node. When this node responds with HTML content containing executable scripts, the payload may execute directly in the top-level window, rather than within the expected sandbox introduced in version 1.103.0. This behavior can enable a malicious actor with workflow creation permissions to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the n8n editor interface. This issue has been patched in version 1.114.0. Workarounds for this issue involve restricting workflow creation and modification privileges to trusted users only, avoiding use of untrusted HTML responses in the “Respond to Webhook” node, and using an external reverse proxy or HTML sanitizer to filter responses that include executable scripts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Yealink T21P_E2 Phone 52.84.0.15 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal. A remote normal privileged attacker can read arbitrary files via a crafted request result read function of the diagnostic component.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N