Comparison Overview

TWC Group

VS

Truper

TWC Group

500 Avebury Boulevard, Milton Keynes, England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-08 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

TWC is a data and digital consultancy – we harness data to empower the wholesale, foodservice and convenience channels. With a vision for these channels to be truly data led, we are passionate about helping our clients thrive and we provide a unique blend of data services, digital platforms and unrivalled knowledge, designed to drive growth for operators and their suppliers. Everything we do is underpinned by our values of transparency, loyalty, ambition and customer-centricity. We are a data partner, not a data broker – we form lasting partnerships that boost performance, drive growth and ultimately, make our customers stand out. We work with over 75 wholesale clients and have over 150 suppliers subscribing to our platforms.

NAICS: 424
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Truper

Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Somos la empresa más reconocida en Latinoamérica en manufactura, distribución y comercialización de herramientas y productos para todos los segmentos de la industria ferretera. Nuestro catálogo está en constante crecimiento, incluye más de 15,000 productos. El buen desempeño de estos está garantizado por el Centro de Calidad Avanzada TRUPER (CCAT), el laboratorio de calidad más avanzado del mundo en el sector ferretero. Contamos con 7 marcas especializadas por segmento: TRUPER, PRETUL,VOLTECK, FOSET, FIERO, Klintek, HERMEX

NAICS: 424
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-whole-sale-company.jpeg
TWC Group
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/truper.jpeg
Truper
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
TWC Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Truper
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TWC Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Truper in 2025.

Incident History — TWC Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TWC Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Truper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Truper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-whole-sale-company.jpeg
TWC Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/truper.jpeg
Truper
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both TWC Group company and Truper company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Truper company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TWC Group company.

In the current year, Truper company and TWC Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Truper company nor TWC Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Truper company nor TWC Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Truper company nor TWC Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TWC Group company nor Truper company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TWC Group company nor Truper company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TWC Group company employs more people globally than Truper company, reflecting its scale as a Wholesale.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MinIO is a high-performance object storage system. In all versions prior to RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z, a privilege escalation vulnerability allows service accounts and STS (Security Token Service) accounts with restricted session policies to bypass their inline policy restrictions when performing operations on their own account, specifically when creating new service accounts for the same user. The vulnerability exists in the IAM policy validation logic where the code incorrectly relied on the DenyOnly argument when validating session policies for restricted accounts. When a session policy is present, the system should validate that the action is allowed by the session policy, not just that it is not denied. An attacker with valid credentials for a restricted service or STS account can create a new service account for itself without policy restrictions, resulting in a new service account with full parent privileges instead of being restricted by the inline policy. This allows the attacker to access buckets and objects beyond their intended restrictions and modify, delete, or create objects outside their authorized scope. The vulnerability is fixed in version RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy. Envoy versions earlier than 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, and 1.33.12 contain a use-after-free vulnerability in the Lua filter. When a Lua script executing in the response phase rewrites a response body so that its size exceeds the configured per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (default 1MB), Envoy generates a local reply whose headers override the original response headers, leaving dangling references and causing a crash. This results in denial of service. Updating to versions 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, or 1.33.12 fixes the issue. Increasing per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (and for HTTP/2 the initial_stream_window_size) or increasing per_request_buffer_limit_bytes / request_body_buffer_limit can reduce the likelihood of triggering the condition but does not correct the underlying memory safety flaw.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in a CMap, via the "UseCMap" entry, leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a credential leakage which could allow an attacker to access other computers or applications.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N