Comparison Overview

TWG Group

VS

Manpower

TWG Group

undefined, Bristol, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

TWG Group provide reliable, consistent and personable staff for all reaches of hospitality, specialising in sports, festivals, leisure, education and large-scale events. We also provide cleaners, litter pickers and warehouse operatives. We are proud to work alongside some of the biggest names in the industry across the UK. Our team works closely with our clients to ensure our service is tailored to their needs. Whether it be a one-off event or an ongoing contract we ensure that our customers are receiving consistency, quality, and reliability at all times. We are an equal opportunities employer and all of our staff are recruited to ensure a selection of experienced, personable and enthusiastic hospitality staff. We believe in the importance of first impressions and endeavour to provide polite, approachable, and motivated staff capable of handling any request. Whatever the need, our energetic staff are personable and confident in providing the very best service, together with that all-important smile.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Manpower

100 Manpower Place, None, Milwaukee, WI, US, 53212
Last Update: 2025-08-13 (UTC)
Between 800 and 849

Manpower is the global leader in contingent and permanent recruitment workforce solutions. We provide the agility businesses need with a continuum of staffing solutions. By leveraging our trusted brands, we have built a deeper talent pool to provide our clients access to the people they need, faster. We effectively assess and develop skills, keeping our associates ahead of the curve, so they can get the jobs done each time, every time.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 28,793
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-waiting-game-ltd-.jpeg
TWG Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manpower-.jpeg
Manpower
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TWG Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Manpower
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TWG Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

Manpower has 12.36% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — TWG Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TWG Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Manpower (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Manpower cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-waiting-game-ltd-.jpeg
TWG Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manpower-.jpeg
Manpower
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Extortion
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Manpower company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TWG Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Manpower company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TWG Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Manpower company has reported more cyber incidents than TWG Group company.

Manpower company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while TWG Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Manpower company nor TWG Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Manpower company nor TWG Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TWG Group company nor Manpower company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TWG Group nor Manpower holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TWG Group company nor Manpower company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Manpower company employs more people globally than TWG Group company, reflecting its scale as a Staffing and Recruiting.

Neither TWG Group nor Manpower holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TWG Group nor Manpower holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TWG Group nor Manpower holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TWG Group nor Manpower holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TWG Group nor Manpower holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TWG Group nor Manpower holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X