Comparison Overview

The Vermont Community Foundation

VS

Baltimore Community Foundation

The Vermont Community Foundation

3 Court Street, Middlebury, VT, 05753, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vermontcf.org

We are a family of hundreds of funds and foundations established by Vermonters to serve their charitable goals. We provide the advice, investment vehicles, and back-office expertise to make giving easy and inspiring. We provide leadership in giving by responding to community needs and keeping Vermont's nonprofit sector vital. Together, our funds and programs provide more than $15 million a year in grants and other investments in Vermont. We serve the entire state of Vermont and our offices are located in downtown Middlebury.

NAICS: 8132
NAICS Definition: Grantmaking and Giving Services
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Baltimore Community Foundation

11 E Mt Royal Ave, Baltimore, Maryland, 21202, US
Last Update: 2026-02-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bcf.org

For 50 years, the Baltimore Community Foundation has been connecting people who are passionate about their city and purposeful in their philanthropy. This is giving by and for the people of Baltimore. BCF’s staff is deeply engaged in local communities to learn about effective, community-led solutions firsthand. These relationships inform our donor services, allowing us to spotlight the best ways to support our community and multiply impact. With BCF’s guidance, donors—individuals, families, businesses—discover meaningful giving, invest their funds wisely and contribute to the change taking hold in Baltimore. BCF amplifies our donors’ philanthropy with strategic grants, impact investments, special initiatives and advocacy to strengthen schools and neighborhoods, so that every child and family has the opportunity to thrive.

NAICS: 813
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-vermont-community-foundation.jpeg
The Vermont Community Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltimore-community-foundation.jpeg
Baltimore Community Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Vermont Community Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baltimore Community Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Philanthropic Fundraising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Vermont Community Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs Philanthropic Fundraising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baltimore Community Foundation in 2026.

Incident History — The Vermont Community Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Vermont Community Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Baltimore Community Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baltimore Community Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-vermont-community-foundation.jpeg
The Vermont Community Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltimore-community-foundation.jpeg
Baltimore Community Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Vermont Community Foundation company and Baltimore Community Foundation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Baltimore Community Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Vermont Community Foundation company.

In the current year, Baltimore Community Foundation company and The Vermont Community Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Baltimore Community Foundation company nor The Vermont Community Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Baltimore Community Foundation company nor The Vermont Community Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Baltimore Community Foundation company nor The Vermont Community Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Vermont Community Foundation company nor Baltimore Community Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Vermont Community Foundation nor Baltimore Community Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Vermont Community Foundation company nor Baltimore Community Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Vermont Community Foundation company employs more people globally than Baltimore Community Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Philanthropic Fundraising Services.

Neither The Vermont Community Foundation nor Baltimore Community Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Vermont Community Foundation nor Baltimore Community Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Vermont Community Foundation nor Baltimore Community Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Vermont Community Foundation nor Baltimore Community Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Vermont Community Foundation nor Baltimore Community Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Vermont Community Foundation nor Baltimore Community Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References