Comparison Overview

The Urban Leaders Fellowship

VS

Rights & Democracy Project

The Urban Leaders Fellowship

5405 E. 33rd Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80207, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

The Urban Leaders Fellowship is a paid fellowship that recruits the best and brightest for an intensive, seven-week experience in eight premier cities across the country. Working together with other ambitious, mission-driven individuals, ULF will empower you to bring about real and lasting change in the community in which you work. Policy Advancement Fellows partner with an elected official, spending half their time on a critical policy project. These leaders have a vision for how their city can improve, and you'll work alongside them to make that vision a reality. Community Impact In order to impact real and lasting change, smart policy is not enough. Thus, fellows spend the other half of their time working with an innovative partner organization, from non-profits to tech startups, committed to social justice & community impact. People Development We exist to develop and shape the future leaders of our nation. Throughout the fellowship, we will work with you to identify the right career path, connect you with leaders in the field, and provide leadership and career coaching.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rights & Democracy Project

70 S Winooski Ave, Burlington, Vermont, 05401, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

Our mission is to bring people together to take action to build healthy communities and make the values of our communities guide the policies of our government. We are building a popular movement to advance rights and build a real democracy. We work in partnership with community groups, progressive unions, faith communities, organizations fighting for human and civil rights, and environmental and climate action groups.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-urban-leaders-fellowship.jpeg
The Urban Leaders Fellowship
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rights-&-democracy-project.jpeg
Rights & Democracy Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Urban Leaders Fellowship
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rights & Democracy Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Urban Leaders Fellowship in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rights & Democracy Project in 2025.

Incident History — The Urban Leaders Fellowship (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Urban Leaders Fellowship cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rights & Democracy Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rights & Democracy Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-urban-leaders-fellowship.jpeg
The Urban Leaders Fellowship
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rights-&-democracy-project.jpeg
Rights & Democracy Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rights & Democracy Project company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Urban Leaders Fellowship company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rights & Democracy Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Urban Leaders Fellowship company.

In the current year, Rights & Democracy Project company and The Urban Leaders Fellowship company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rights & Democracy Project company nor The Urban Leaders Fellowship company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rights & Democracy Project company nor The Urban Leaders Fellowship company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rights & Democracy Project company nor The Urban Leaders Fellowship company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Urban Leaders Fellowship company nor Rights & Democracy Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Urban Leaders Fellowship nor Rights & Democracy Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Urban Leaders Fellowship company nor Rights & Democracy Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Urban Leaders Fellowship company employs more people globally than Rights & Democracy Project company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither The Urban Leaders Fellowship nor Rights & Democracy Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Urban Leaders Fellowship nor Rights & Democracy Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Urban Leaders Fellowship nor Rights & Democracy Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Urban Leaders Fellowship nor Rights & Democracy Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Urban Leaders Fellowship nor Rights & Democracy Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Urban Leaders Fellowship nor Rights & Democracy Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H