Comparison Overview

The UPS Store

VS

Nike

The UPS Store

6060 Cornerstone Court West, None, San Diego, CA, US, 92121
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

With more than 5,000 locally owned locations across North America, The UPS Store is the nation’s largest retail network of shipping, postal, printing and business service centers. The UPS Store, Inc., franchisor for The UPS Store locations in the U.S., is a wholly owned subsidiary of UPS. The UPS Store franchise locations offer consumers and small businesses a wide range of products and services to meet all their needs in one convenient location, including printing, packaging, shipping, mailbox services, moving supplies and other in-center services. The UPS Store has been recognized as the No. 1 Postal & Business Services franchise for 31 years straight by Entrepreneur Magazine “Franchise 500.” USA Today, G.I. Jobs recognized The UPS Store franchise as one of the 50 Top Franchises for Military Veterans. Additionally, The UPS Store franchise was named American Brand Excellence Award Winner in the Retail category by City Business Journals. The UPS Store retail ownership opportunities are available to “qualifying entrepreneurs.” The UPS Store has opportunities throughout the U.S. and Canada. Through an association with Franchise America Finance and The Bancorp Bank, The UPS Store also offers the option of national funding for qualified franchisee candidates. Be your own boss by opening a The UPS Store retail location. Learn more at https://www.theupsstorefranchise.com/

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 11,394
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Nike

One Bowerman Drive, Beaverton, OR, US, 97005
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

NIKE, Inc. is a purpose-driven organization energized by a shared commitment to move the world forward through the power of sport. We champion diversity and amplify individual passions to bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete* in the world. Here, every teammate has a role to play. We work together, embracing our differences and pushing boundaries, to achieve collective success. For more information on how you can contribute to a world-class team, visit our career site at nike.com/careers and join our talent community at https://nikeats.avature.net/niketalentcommunity.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 85,136
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-ups-store.jpeg
The UPS Store
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nike.jpeg
Nike
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The UPS Store
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nike
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The UPS Store in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nike in 2025.

Incident History — The UPS Store (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The UPS Store cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nike (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nike cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-ups-store.jpeg
The UPS Store
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nike.jpeg
Nike
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nike company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The UPS Store company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The UPS Store company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Nike company has not reported any.

In the current year, Nike company and The UPS Store company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nike company nor The UPS Store company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

The UPS Store company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Nike company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Nike company nor The UPS Store company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The UPS Store company nor Nike company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The UPS Store nor Nike holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Nike company and The UPS Store company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Nike company employs more people globally than The UPS Store company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither The UPS Store nor Nike holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The UPS Store nor Nike holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The UPS Store nor Nike holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The UPS Store nor Nike holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The UPS Store nor Nike holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The UPS Store nor Nike holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H