Comparison Overview

The University of New Mexico

VS

University of Tehran

The University of New Mexico

1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, nm, US, 87131
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1889, The University of New Mexico now occupies 600 acres along old Route 66 in the heart of Albuquerque, a city of more than 700,000 people. From the magnificent mesas to the west, past the banks of the historic Rio Grande to the Sandia Mountains to the east, Albuquerque is a blend of culture and cuisine, styles and stories, people, pursuits and panoramas. Offering a distinctive campus environment with a Pueblo Revival architectural theme, the campus echoes the buildings of nearby Pueblo Indian villages. The nationally recognized Campus Arboretum and the popular Duck Pond offer an outstanding botanical experience in the midst of one of New Mexico's great public open spaces.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,091
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of Tehran

16 Azar Street, Enghlab Avenue, Tehran, 1417466191, IR
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

University of Tehran, an iconic institution of higher education in Iran, traces its origins back seven centuries to its foundation as a houza (traditional religious school). Over time, it evolved from this religious structure into a modern academic institution. About a century ago, the Dar-ol-Fonoon College became the first engineering school in its modern form, marking a significant step in Iran's higher education landscape. The University of Tehran, as it is known today, was officially inaugurated in the winter of 1934. Currently, the University of Tehran offers 976 programs across 500 fields within 39 faculties and 120 departments located on campuses in Tehran, Qom, Karaj, Kish, and Jolfa. The university is supported by a distinguished faculty of over 2,000 tenured members. Approximately 15% of Iran’s Centers of Excellence, as recognized by the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology, are affiliated with the University of Tehran. UT’s dedication to research is reflected in its more than 40 research centers, 3,500 laboratories, and its leading press, which publishes over 50 peer-reviewed scientific journals. For more details on the University of Tehran’s colleges and faculties, please visit: https://ut.ac.ir/en/page/9786/colleges-faculties-international-campuses

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 13,436
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-university-of-new-mexico.jpeg
The University of New Mexico
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-tehran.jpeg
University of Tehran
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The University of New Mexico
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Tehran
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of New Mexico in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Tehran in 2026.

Incident History — The University of New Mexico (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of New Mexico cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Tehran (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Tehran cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-university-of-new-mexico.jpeg
The University of New Mexico
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-tehran.jpeg
University of Tehran
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Tehran company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The University of New Mexico company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, University of Tehran company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The University of New Mexico company.

In the current year, University of Tehran company and The University of New Mexico company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Tehran company nor The University of New Mexico company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Tehran company nor The University of New Mexico company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Tehran company nor The University of New Mexico company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The University of New Mexico company nor University of Tehran company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor University of Tehran holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The University of New Mexico company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Tehran company.

University of Tehran company employs more people globally than The University of New Mexico company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor University of Tehran holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor University of Tehran holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor University of Tehran holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor University of Tehran holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor University of Tehran holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor University of Tehran holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.