Comparison Overview

The University of New Mexico

VS

The Johns Hopkins University

The University of New Mexico

1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, nm, US, 87131
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1889, The University of New Mexico now occupies 600 acres along old Route 66 in the heart of Albuquerque, a city of more than 700,000 people. From the magnificent mesas to the west, past the banks of the historic Rio Grande to the Sandia Mountains to the east, Albuquerque is a blend of culture and cuisine, styles and stories, people, pursuits and panoramas. Offering a distinctive campus environment with a Pueblo Revival architectural theme, the campus echoes the buildings of nearby Pueblo Indian villages. The nationally recognized Campus Arboretum and the popular Duck Pond offer an outstanding botanical experience in the midst of one of New Mexico's great public open spaces.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,091
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Johns Hopkins University

3400 N Charles St, Mason Hall, Baltimore, MD, US, 21218-2688
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

We are America’s first research university, founded in 1876 on the principle that by pursuing big ideas and sharing what we learn, we can make the world a better place. For more than 140 years, our faculty and students have worked side by side in pursuit of discoveries that improve lives. Johns Hopkins enrolls more than 24,000 full- and part-time students throughout nine academic divisions. Our faculty and students study, teach, and learn across more than 260 programs in the arts and music, the humanities, the social and natural sciences, engineering, international studies, education, business, and the health professions.The university has four campuses in Baltimore; one in Washington, D.C.; one in Montgomery County, Maryland; and facilities throughout the Baltimore-Washington region as well as in China and Italy. The university takes its name from 19th-century Maryland philanthropist Johns Hopkins, an entrepreneur who believed in improving public health and education in Baltimore and beyond.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 17,735
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-university-of-new-mexico.jpeg
The University of New Mexico
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johns-hopkins-university.jpeg
The Johns Hopkins University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The University of New Mexico
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Johns Hopkins University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of New Mexico in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Johns Hopkins University in 2026.

Incident History — The University of New Mexico (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of New Mexico cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Johns Hopkins University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Johns Hopkins University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-university-of-new-mexico.jpeg
The University of New Mexico
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johns-hopkins-university.jpeg
The Johns Hopkins University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Johns Hopkins University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The University of New Mexico company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Johns Hopkins University company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The University of New Mexico company.

In the current year, The Johns Hopkins University company and The University of New Mexico company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Johns Hopkins University company nor The University of New Mexico company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Johns Hopkins University company nor The University of New Mexico company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Johns Hopkins University company nor The University of New Mexico company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The University of New Mexico company nor The Johns Hopkins University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor The Johns Hopkins University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Johns Hopkins University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The University of New Mexico company.

The Johns Hopkins University company employs more people globally than The University of New Mexico company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor The Johns Hopkins University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor The Johns Hopkins University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor The Johns Hopkins University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor The Johns Hopkins University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor The Johns Hopkins University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor The Johns Hopkins University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.