Comparison Overview

The University of New Mexico

VS

Florida International University

The University of New Mexico

1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, nm, US, 87131
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1889, The University of New Mexico now occupies 600 acres along old Route 66 in the heart of Albuquerque, a city of more than 700,000 people. From the magnificent mesas to the west, past the banks of the historic Rio Grande to the Sandia Mountains to the east, Albuquerque is a blend of culture and cuisine, styles and stories, people, pursuits and panoramas. Offering a distinctive campus environment with a Pueblo Revival architectural theme, the campus echoes the buildings of nearby Pueblo Indian villages. The nationally recognized Campus Arboretum and the popular Duck Pond offer an outstanding botanical experience in the midst of one of New Mexico's great public open spaces.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,091
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Florida International University

11200 S. W. 8 Street, Miami, FL, US, 33199
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 700 and 749

FIU is Miami's public research university. Offering bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees, both on campus and fully online. Designated a Preeminent State Research University, FIU emphasizes research as a major component in the university's mission. For more than 50 years, FIU has positioned itself as one of South Florida's anchor institutions by solving some of the greatest challenges of our time. We are dedicated to enriching the lives of the local and global community. With a student body of more than 56,000, we are among the largest universities in the nation and have collectively graduated more than 300,000 alumni, 165,000 of whom live and work in South Florida.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 12,548
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-university-of-new-mexico.jpeg
The University of New Mexico
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-international-university.jpeg
Florida International University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The University of New Mexico
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Florida International University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of New Mexico in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida International University in 2026.

Incident History — The University of New Mexico (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of New Mexico cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Florida International University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida International University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-university-of-new-mexico.jpeg
The University of New Mexico
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-international-university.jpeg
Florida International University
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

The University of New Mexico company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Florida International University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Florida International University company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The University of New Mexico company has not reported any.

In the current year, Florida International University company and The University of New Mexico company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Florida International University company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while The University of New Mexico company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Florida International University company nor The University of New Mexico company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Florida International University company nor The University of New Mexico company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The University of New Mexico company nor Florida International University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor Florida International University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The University of New Mexico company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Florida International University company.

Florida International University company employs more people globally than The University of New Mexico company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor Florida International University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor Florida International University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor Florida International University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor Florida International University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor Florida International University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The University of New Mexico nor Florida International University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.