Comparison Overview

The Taunt Law Firm

VS

Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC

The Taunt Law Firm

700 E Maple Road, Second Floor, Birmingham, MI, 48009, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Taunt Law Firm has serviced the metro Detroit area for more than 40 years with legal expertise in insolvency, business, commercial litigation and estate planning and probate. With a specialty in insolvency, our professionals provide comprehensive strategies and legal services for current business issues, litigation, and transactions, as well as planning for the future from an estate and asset protection perspective.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC

102 9th Street, San Antonio, TX, 78215, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24

No matter what you do or where you live, we believe the simple values of honesty, integrity, and character are what make a difference. Simple values. Sometimes broken. Never forgotten. Because of our commitment to these values as our way to live, we have had clients trust us to represent them in over 36 different states and in 2 foreign countries. Our accent may be different, you might like hockey and we like football, but the values remain the same. We believe this is why businesses, farmers, veterans and ordinary people trust us to protect them.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-taunt-law-firm.jpeg
The Taunt Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phipps-deacon-purnell-pllc.jpeg
Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Taunt Law Firm
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Taunt Law Firm in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — The Taunt Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Taunt Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-taunt-law-firm.jpeg
The Taunt Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phipps-deacon-purnell-pllc.jpeg
Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Taunt Law Firm company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Taunt Law Firm company.

In the current year, Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC company and The Taunt Law Firm company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC company nor The Taunt Law Firm company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC company nor The Taunt Law Firm company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC company nor The Taunt Law Firm company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Taunt Law Firm company nor Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Taunt Law Firm nor Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Taunt Law Firm company nor Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Taunt Law Firm company employs more people globally than Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Taunt Law Firm nor Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Taunt Law Firm nor Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Taunt Law Firm nor Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Taunt Law Firm nor Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Taunt Law Firm nor Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Taunt Law Firm nor Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X