Comparison Overview

The Sports Museum

VS

Glasgow Science Centre

The Sports Museum

100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://sportsmuseum.org

The Sports Museum is a 501(c)(3) non-profit educational institution housed in the TD Garden that has served Boston and New England for almost 50 years. At The Sports Museum, we celebrate the character of Boston sports -- the unique brand of teamwork, determination, responsibility, courage, fairness, and other qualities of character possessed by our teams and athletes that make Boston "The Greatest Sports City in America."​ Equally important, we use this distinctly rich heritage to help build character in kids so that they can stand strong in the face of drugs, violence, and other dangers.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Glasgow Science Centre

50 Pacific Quay, Glasgow, G511EA, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://www.glasgowsciencecentre.org

Glasgow Science Centre is one of Scotland's must-see visitor attractions - presenting concepts of science and technology in unique and inspiring ways. Glasgow Science Centre is an independent Scottish Charity (SCO30809) the aims of which are: To create interactive experiences that inspire, challenge and engage to increase awareness of science for all in Scotland; To enhance the quality of science and technology learning; To communicate the role of leading edge science and technology in shaping Scotland's future; To build partnerships to develop our national role in science communication and education; To promote Scotland's science, education and innovation capability. As well as providing immersive and wonderous science and technology experiences for children and adults of all ages, we have numerous corporate events spaces available allowing you to make your event (whatever size it may be) a unique one. Please give us a call on 0141 420 5008 to discuss your requirements.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 135
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-sports-museum.jpeg
The Sports Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glasgow-science-centre.jpeg
Glasgow Science Centre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Sports Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Glasgow Science Centre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Sports Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glasgow Science Centre in 2026.

Incident History — The Sports Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Sports Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Glasgow Science Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glasgow Science Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-sports-museum.jpeg
The Sports Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glasgow-science-centre.jpeg
Glasgow Science Centre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Sports Museum company and Glasgow Science Centre company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Glasgow Science Centre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Sports Museum company.

In the current year, Glasgow Science Centre company and The Sports Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Glasgow Science Centre company nor The Sports Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Glasgow Science Centre company nor The Sports Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Glasgow Science Centre company nor The Sports Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Sports Museum company nor Glasgow Science Centre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Sports Museum nor Glasgow Science Centre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Glasgow Science Centre company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Sports Museum company.

Glasgow Science Centre company employs more people globally than The Sports Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Sports Museum nor Glasgow Science Centre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Sports Museum nor Glasgow Science Centre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Sports Museum nor Glasgow Science Centre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Sports Museum nor Glasgow Science Centre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Sports Museum nor Glasgow Science Centre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Sports Museum nor Glasgow Science Centre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References