Comparison Overview

The Skyscraper Museum

VS

Philadelphia Contemporary

The Skyscraper Museum

39 Battery Place, New York, 10280, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.skyscraper.org

Located in New York City, the world's first and foremost vertical metropolis, The Skyscraper Museum celebrates the City's rich architectural heritage and examines the historical forces and individuals that have shaped its successive skylines. Through exhibitions, programs and publications, the Museum explores tall buildings as objects of design, products of technology, sites of construction, investments in real estate, and places of work and residence. The Skyscraper Museum is located in lower Manhattan's Battery Park City at 39 Battery Place. Museum hours are 12-6 PM, Wednesday-Sunday. General admission is $5, $2.50 for students and seniors.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Philadelphia Contemporary

1112 N. Bodine St, Philadelphia, PA, 19123, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://philadelphiacontemporary.org/

Philadelphia Contemporary presents cross-disciplinary art through a dynamic model of collaboration and partnership—co-creating art, anywhere. Since 2016, we have offered a robust program of pop-up exhibitions and performances across the Philadelphia area in collaboration with various partner organizations, while working towards building a new permanent home. Philadelphia Contemporary is a non-profit 501(c)(3).

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-skyscraper-museum.jpeg
The Skyscraper Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philadelphiacontemporary.jpeg
Philadelphia Contemporary
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Skyscraper Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Philadelphia Contemporary
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Skyscraper Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philadelphia Contemporary in 2026.

Incident History — The Skyscraper Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Skyscraper Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Philadelphia Contemporary (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philadelphia Contemporary cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-skyscraper-museum.jpeg
The Skyscraper Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philadelphiacontemporary.jpeg
Philadelphia Contemporary
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Skyscraper Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Philadelphia Contemporary company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Philadelphia Contemporary company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Skyscraper Museum company.

In the current year, Philadelphia Contemporary company and The Skyscraper Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Philadelphia Contemporary company nor The Skyscraper Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Philadelphia Contemporary company nor The Skyscraper Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Philadelphia Contemporary company nor The Skyscraper Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum company nor Philadelphia Contemporary company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Philadelphia Contemporary holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum company nor Philadelphia Contemporary company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Skyscraper Museum company employs more people globally than Philadelphia Contemporary company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Philadelphia Contemporary holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Philadelphia Contemporary holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Philadelphia Contemporary holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Philadelphia Contemporary holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Philadelphia Contemporary holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Philadelphia Contemporary holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References