Comparison Overview

The Skyscraper Museum

VS

Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS

The Skyscraper Museum

39 Battery Place, New York, 10280, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Located in New York City, the world's first and foremost vertical metropolis, The Skyscraper Museum celebrates the City's rich architectural heritage and examines the historical forces and individuals that have shaped its successive skylines. Through exhibitions, programs and publications, the Museum explores tall buildings as objects of design, products of technology, sites of construction, investments in real estate, and places of work and residence. The Skyscraper Museum is located in lower Manhattan's Battery Park City at 39 Battery Place. Museum hours are 12-6 PM, Wednesday-Sunday. General admission is $5, $2.50 for students and seniors.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS

20716, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Carolyn Adams & Associates is a leading consulting firm for new, emerging and established museums. With industry successes spanning more than twenty years, the firm is adept at optimizing the resources and leadership of institutions to place each client at the forefront of the industry. Carolyn Adams & Associates strategically guides institutions, with consideration of each unique need, toward sustainability through cutting edge approaches that address all facets of institutional planning, board and staff training, new audience recruitment and retention, and donor/stakeholder cultivation.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-skyscraper-museum.jpeg
The Skyscraper Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Skyscraper Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Skyscraper Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS in 2026.

Incident History — The Skyscraper Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Skyscraper Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-skyscraper-museum.jpeg
The Skyscraper Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Skyscraper Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Skyscraper Museum company.

In the current year, Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS company and The Skyscraper Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS company nor The Skyscraper Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS company nor The Skyscraper Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS company nor The Skyscraper Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum company nor Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum company nor Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS company employs more people globally than The Skyscraper Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Skyscraper Museum nor Carolyn Adams & Associates/ ADAMS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H