Comparison Overview

The Simmonds Group

VS

Dynamics Scientific, Inc.

The Simmonds Group

815 Grandview Ave, Columbus, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Process Control Headhunters. Factory Automation. Executive Search firm specializing in Process Control and Factory Automation. Our clients include small to mid-size firms as well as Fortune 500 companies. We enable you to access one of the largest talent pools and a broad range of services to meet your hiring goals.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dynamics Scientific, Inc.

801 Travis , Suite 2025, Houston, Texas, US, 77002
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Dynamics Scientific, Inc. promotes the Technology of Safe Resource-saving Operation and Maintenance of Machinery (SROMM - tech) among petroleum refineries and petrochemicals. The SROMM-tech is based on the real-time diagnostic COMPACS system, which we deploy in every facility of an entire plant on a turn-key basis. The COMPACS system measures a wide range of vibration and other informative parameters, analyses them, and deliver in real-time prescriptions to operators and maintenance staff about urgent corrective actions to be taken to eliminate existing destructive forces or to inhibit machinery'​ degradation. The COMPACS system identifies almost all defects and malfunctions in rotating equipment with probability 97-98%. In fixed equipment, the system recognizes deviations of an ongoing process which enforce degradation of equipment's body and lead to crack's emergence, moreover, the COMPACS system locates an area of the crack and monitors its evolution in real-time.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-simmonds-group-mrinetwork.jpeg
The Simmonds Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamics-spc.jpeg
Dynamics Scientific, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Simmonds Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dynamics Scientific, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Simmonds Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynamics Scientific, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — The Simmonds Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Simmonds Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dynamics Scientific, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynamics Scientific, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-simmonds-group-mrinetwork.jpeg
The Simmonds Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamics-spc.jpeg
Dynamics Scientific, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Simmonds Group company and Dynamics Scientific, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Dynamics Scientific, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Simmonds Group company.

In the current year, Dynamics Scientific, Inc. company and The Simmonds Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dynamics Scientific, Inc. company nor The Simmonds Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dynamics Scientific, Inc. company nor The Simmonds Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dynamics Scientific, Inc. company nor The Simmonds Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Simmonds Group company nor Dynamics Scientific, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Simmonds Group nor Dynamics Scientific, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Simmonds Group company nor Dynamics Scientific, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dynamics Scientific, Inc. company employs more people globally than The Simmonds Group company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither The Simmonds Group nor Dynamics Scientific, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Simmonds Group nor Dynamics Scientific, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Simmonds Group nor Dynamics Scientific, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Simmonds Group nor Dynamics Scientific, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Simmonds Group nor Dynamics Scientific, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Simmonds Group nor Dynamics Scientific, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H