Comparison Overview

The SignMan Co. Ltd.

VS

Kym Abrams Design

The SignMan Co. Ltd.

P.O. Box CB-11325, Nassau, undefined, undefined, BS
Last Update: 2025-12-01

We are a full service design, fabrication and imaging centre. Our team can take you from initial concept to final installation. The SignMan consists of well-trained people in the graphics industry. We have experience in sign fabrication from vinyl to large format printing; from three-dimensional carved signs to complete architectural systems. SOLUTION ENGINEERING With 20 years experience in the business, we have the knowledge and skills necessary to successfully walk with you from start to finish solving your signage needs. From the first time you step through the door to when our team installs your sign – nothing is too big or small for us. A LOCAL COMPANY 100% managed and operated by Bahamians. Our install team is the best on the island!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kym Abrams Design

213 W Institute Pl. Suite 608, Chicago, Illinois, 60610, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are storytellers. Our clients do wonderful work in health care, education, arts and the environment. We help them tell their story. We start by listening, to learn about their mission and goals. We think with them about strategy, audience, message and budget. Then we work together to give their story a unique face and voice that make it memorable.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-signman-co.-ltd..jpeg
The SignMan Co. Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kym-abrams-design.jpeg
Kym Abrams Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The SignMan Co. Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kym Abrams Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The SignMan Co. Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kym Abrams Design in 2025.

Incident History — The SignMan Co. Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The SignMan Co. Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kym Abrams Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kym Abrams Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-signman-co.-ltd..jpeg
The SignMan Co. Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kym-abrams-design.jpeg
Kym Abrams Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The SignMan Co. Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kym Abrams Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kym Abrams Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The SignMan Co. Ltd. company.

In the current year, Kym Abrams Design company and The SignMan Co. Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kym Abrams Design company nor The SignMan Co. Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kym Abrams Design company nor The SignMan Co. Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kym Abrams Design company nor The SignMan Co. Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The SignMan Co. Ltd. company nor Kym Abrams Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The SignMan Co. Ltd. nor Kym Abrams Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The SignMan Co. Ltd. company nor Kym Abrams Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The SignMan Co. Ltd. company employs more people globally than Kym Abrams Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither The SignMan Co. Ltd. nor Kym Abrams Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The SignMan Co. Ltd. nor Kym Abrams Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The SignMan Co. Ltd. nor Kym Abrams Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The SignMan Co. Ltd. nor Kym Abrams Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The SignMan Co. Ltd. nor Kym Abrams Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The SignMan Co. Ltd. nor Kym Abrams Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X