Comparison Overview

Show-Me Institute

VS

OCEG

Show-Me Institute

5297 Washington Place, Saint Louis, MO, 63108, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Show-Me Institute is a research and educational institute dedicated to improving the quality of life for all citizens of Missouri by advancing sensible, well-researched solutions to state and local policy issues. The institute’s scholars study public policy problems and develop proposals to increase economic opportunity for ordinary Missourians. It then promotes those solutions by publishing studies, briefing papers, and other educational materials, which help policymakers, the media, and the general public gain a better understanding of the issues. The work of the institute is rooted in the American tradition of free markets and individual liberty. The institute’s scholars seek to move beyond the 20th-century mindset that every problem has a government solution. Instead, they develop policies that respect the rights of the individual, encourage creativity and hard work, and nurture independence and social cooperation. By applying those principles to the problems facing the state, the Show-Me Institute hopes to build a Missouri with a thriving economy and a vibrant civil society — a Missouri that leads the nation in wealth, freedom, and opportunity for all.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

OCEG

4144 N. 44th Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85018, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

OCEG, a global nonprofit think tank, pioneered GRC and Principled Performance®. For over twenty years, OCEG has democratized GRC knowledge, offering open-access frameworks, resources, education, and certifications to professionals worldwide. Through the OCEG GRC Capability Model™ and Principled Performance®, OCEG drives leadership and strategy. OCEG's 150K+ members include individuals at all levels, from C-suite to individual contributors across small and midsize businesses, international corporations, nonprofits, and government agencies. OCEG aims to establish democratized GRC knowledge as the global standard by offering open-source frameworks and affordable, accredited education. OCEG educates its members on achieving Principled Performance through integrated capability models across six critical disciplines: Governance and oversight, Strategy and performance, Risk and decision Support, Compliance and ethics, Security and continuity, and Audit and assurance.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-show-me-institute.jpeg
Show-Me Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/open-compliance-&-ethics-group-oceg-.jpeg
OCEG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Show-Me Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OCEG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Show-Me Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OCEG in 2025.

Incident History — Show-Me Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Show-Me Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OCEG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OCEG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-show-me-institute.jpeg
Show-Me Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/open-compliance-&-ethics-group-oceg-.jpeg
OCEG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Show-Me Institute company and OCEG company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, OCEG company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Show-Me Institute company.

In the current year, OCEG company and Show-Me Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OCEG company nor Show-Me Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OCEG company nor Show-Me Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OCEG company nor Show-Me Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Show-Me Institute company nor OCEG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Show-Me Institute nor OCEG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

OCEG company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Show-Me Institute company.

OCEG company employs more people globally than Show-Me Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Show-Me Institute nor OCEG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Show-Me Institute nor OCEG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Show-Me Institute nor OCEG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Show-Me Institute nor OCEG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Show-Me Institute nor OCEG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Show-Me Institute nor OCEG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X