Comparison Overview

The Scorched Pallet

VS

Katja Futon

The Scorched Pallet

PO Box 771542, Miami, 33177, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

The Scorched Pallet is a Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business focused on the design and creation of custom, hand made, home decor items made of reclaimed wood and metal. Travis, the creator of The Scorched Pallet has been diagnosed with PTSD and finds tranquility in the design and creation process of wood working and metal repurposing. The Scorched Pallet’s goal is to provide all of our clients with a one of a kind, custom; by hand not factory made, home decor items such as unique cabinets, tables, wine racks, memorials, and more.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Katja Futon

M.v.Bouwdijk Bastiaansestraat 34 Amsterdam, Noord Holland 1054 SP, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

100 % biologische katoenen matrassen ( futons ) dekbedden en kussens op elke gewenste maat handgemaakt . sinds 1985 toegewijd vakmanschap op traditioneel Japanse wijze bij het vervaardigen van deze produkten. bijv. wattenlagen katoen worden gesplitst alvorens ze worden verwerkt, waardoor een veerkrachtig resultaat wordt bereikt. de katoenleveranciers hebben een GOTS-certificaat, wat garant staat voor sociaal verantwoord en biologische teelt. verder verkoop van houten onderstellen en kussens gevuld met boekweitkaf.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-scorched-pallet.jpeg
The Scorched Pallet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/katja-futon.jpeg
Katja Futon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Scorched Pallet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Katja Futon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Scorched Pallet in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Katja Futon in 2025.

Incident History — The Scorched Pallet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Scorched Pallet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Katja Futon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Katja Futon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-scorched-pallet.jpeg
The Scorched Pallet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/katja-futon.jpeg
Katja Futon
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Katja Futon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Scorched Pallet company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Katja Futon company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Scorched Pallet company.

In the current year, Katja Futon company and The Scorched Pallet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Katja Futon company nor The Scorched Pallet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Katja Futon company nor The Scorched Pallet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Katja Futon company nor The Scorched Pallet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Scorched Pallet company nor Katja Futon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Scorched Pallet nor Katja Futon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Scorched Pallet company nor Katja Futon company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither The Scorched Pallet nor Katja Futon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Scorched Pallet nor Katja Futon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Scorched Pallet nor Katja Futon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Scorched Pallet nor Katja Futon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Scorched Pallet nor Katja Futon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Scorched Pallet nor Katja Futon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.