Comparison Overview

The San Diego Museum of Art

VS

Clark Art Institute

The San Diego Museum of Art

1450 El Prado, San Diego, California, 92101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sdmart.org/

Providing a rich and diverse cultural experience, The San Diego Museum of Art houses some of the world’s finest art. Located in the heart of Balboa Park, the Museum’s internationally renowned collection of more than 32,000 works—dating from 3000 BC to present day—includes Spanish and Italian old masters, the Edwin Binney 3rd Collection of South Asian paintings, East Asian art, art from the Americas, Modern and Contemporary art, and the Museum of Photographic Arts at The San Diego Museum of Art (MOPA@SDMA). The Museum regularly features major exhibitions of art from around the world, as well as extensive cultural and community engagement programs for all ages. The San Diego Museum of Art hosts experiences that invite visitors to explore art through music, dance, film, food, and so much more. At The San Diego Museum of Art, exhibition text is always in English and Spanish.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 139
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Clark Art Institute

225 South Street, Williamstown, Massachusetts, 01267, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://clarkart.edu

The Clark is one of only a handful of institutions globally with a dual mission as an art museum and a distinguished center for research and higher education, dedicated to advancing and extending the public understanding of art. No other institution of its scale and character has such a complex and exhilarating mission—complex because interrelating the differing purposes of an art museum and a center for research and higher education is so challenging, and exhilarating because the possibilities and implications of this combination are so dynamic.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-san-diego-museum-of-art.jpeg
The San Diego Museum of Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-and-francine-clark-art-institute.jpeg
Clark Art Institute
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The San Diego Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clark Art Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The San Diego Museum of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clark Art Institute in 2026.

Incident History — The San Diego Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The San Diego Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clark Art Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clark Art Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-san-diego-museum-of-art.jpeg
The San Diego Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-and-francine-clark-art-institute.jpeg
Clark Art Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Clark Art Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The San Diego Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Clark Art Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The San Diego Museum of Art company.

In the current year, Clark Art Institute company and The San Diego Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clark Art Institute company nor The San Diego Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Clark Art Institute company nor The San Diego Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Clark Art Institute company nor The San Diego Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The San Diego Museum of Art company nor Clark Art Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The San Diego Museum of Art nor Clark Art Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The San Diego Museum of Art company nor Clark Art Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The San Diego Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Clark Art Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The San Diego Museum of Art nor Clark Art Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The San Diego Museum of Art nor Clark Art Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The San Diego Museum of Art nor Clark Art Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The San Diego Museum of Art nor Clark Art Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The San Diego Museum of Art nor Clark Art Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The San Diego Museum of Art nor Clark Art Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References