Comparison Overview

San Diego Art Institute

VS

Museum of Future Sports

San Diego Art Institute

1439 El Prado, San Diego, 92101-1617, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sandiego-art.org/

San Diego Art Institute was initially founded in 1941 as the San Diego Business Men's Art Club. In 1950 the name was changed to the San Diego Art Institute, and three years later women were allowed membership into the organization. SDAI became a nonprofit in 1963 and has since remained the premier organization showcasing artists from the Southern California/Baja Norte region. We achieve this mission by creating innovative programs that respond to the needs of our communities, by offering world-class facilities to exhibit artwork, and by forging partnerships on a local and global scale.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Museum of Future Sports

undefined, San Francisco, CA, 94102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
https://www.futuresports.io/

Museum of Future Sports (MoFS) is a unique-in-class 501c3 non-profit organization launched by sports, gaming, technology & education industry pioneers. MoFS has developed a bespoke combination of educational innovation, entertainment technology & interactive platforms to provide technology access to all, especially under served communities, While supporting the growth of Future Sports communities through ground-breaking events and STEAM education programs. MoFS is a STEM education wonderland that offers ongoing educational programs, workshops and after school leagues focused on engineering, design, coding, game programing through the irresistible lens of sports and games.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-san-diego-art-institute.jpeg
San Diego Art Institute
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mofs.jpeg
Museum of Future Sports
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
San Diego Art Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museum of Future Sports
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Diego Art Institute in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Future Sports in 2026.

Incident History — San Diego Art Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Diego Art Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museum of Future Sports (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Future Sports cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-san-diego-art-institute.jpeg
San Diego Art Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mofs.jpeg
Museum of Future Sports
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

San Diego Art Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of Future Sports company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museum of Future Sports company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to San Diego Art Institute company.

In the current year, Museum of Future Sports company and San Diego Art Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museum of Future Sports company nor San Diego Art Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museum of Future Sports company nor San Diego Art Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museum of Future Sports company nor San Diego Art Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither San Diego Art Institute company nor Museum of Future Sports company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither San Diego Art Institute nor Museum of Future Sports holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither San Diego Art Institute company nor Museum of Future Sports company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

San Diego Art Institute company employs more people globally than Museum of Future Sports company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither San Diego Art Institute nor Museum of Future Sports holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither San Diego Art Institute nor Museum of Future Sports holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither San Diego Art Institute nor Museum of Future Sports holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither San Diego Art Institute nor Museum of Future Sports holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither San Diego Art Institute nor Museum of Future Sports holds HIPAA certification.

Neither San Diego Art Institute nor Museum of Future Sports holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References