Comparison Overview

The Royal Photographic Society

VS

Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier

The Royal Photographic Society

337 Paintworks, Arnos Vale , Bristol, Bristol , BS4 3AR, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Royal Photographic Society was founded in 1853 'to promote the Art and Science of Photography'​, a mission it continues to this day. It has a Royal Charter and is an Educational Charity with 10,000 members. Membership is open to everyone interested in photography in the UK and throughout the world, be they amateur or professional, artist or scientist, young or old. Members are invited to take up the challenge of The Society’s Distinctions. The three levels are Licentiateship, Associateship, and Fellowship and have their knowledge and practical abilities recognised. Through the active online community and the Regional and Special Interest Group events members can share, learn and develop their technical, visual and creative skills. Regions and Groups have meetings, exhibitions and competitions and publish their own newsletters and magazines.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier

6125 Boydton Plank Road, Petersburg, Virginia, 23803, US
Last Update: 2026-01-03
Between 750 and 799

One of “Virginia’s Best Places to Visit” according to the Travel Channel, and designated as a National Historic Landmark, Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier is a 424-acre Civil War campus located in Petersburg, Virginia offering a combination of high-tech museums and hands-on experiences. The Park has four world-class museums and four antebellum homes. Pamplin Historical Park is located on the site of The Breakthrough Battlefield of April 2, 1865, and preserves some of the most extensive Civil War earthworks in the country. The Park also hosts America’s premiere participatory experience, Civil War Adventure Camp. For more information, please call 877-726-7546 or visit www.pamplinpark.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-royal-photographic-society.jpeg
The Royal Photographic Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pamplin-historical-park-&-the-national-museum-of-the-civil-war-soldier.jpeg
Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Royal Photographic Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Royal Photographic Society in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier in 2026.

Incident History — The Royal Photographic Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Royal Photographic Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-royal-photographic-society.jpeg
The Royal Photographic Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pamplin-historical-park-&-the-national-museum-of-the-civil-war-soldier.jpeg
Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Royal Photographic Society company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Royal Photographic Society company.

In the current year, Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier company and The Royal Photographic Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier company nor The Royal Photographic Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier company nor The Royal Photographic Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier company nor The Royal Photographic Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Royal Photographic Society company nor Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Royal Photographic Society nor Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Royal Photographic Society company nor Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Royal Photographic Society company employs more people globally than Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Royal Photographic Society nor Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Royal Photographic Society nor Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Royal Photographic Society nor Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Royal Photographic Society nor Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Royal Photographic Society nor Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Royal Photographic Society nor Pamplin Historical Park & The National Museum of the Civil War Soldier holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N