Comparison Overview

The Royal Institution

VS

Denver Botanic Gardens

The Royal Institution

21 Albemarle Street, London, undefined, W1S 4BS, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rigb.org

The Royal Institution is an independent charity dedicated to connecting people with the world of science. Science shapes our lives, our culture and the world around us. It’s the medical treatment that may save your life. It’s the device in your pocket that connects you to the world. And it’s how we will solve the major global challenges of the future. Our mission is to harness science for the maximum benefit of society. The importance of our mission cannot be overstated. It was recognised by the 58 wealthy individuals who founded the Ri in 1799 and is just as relevant today. But to achieve the full benefits of what science has to offer, we must ensure that there is a healthy interaction between science and society – something we have pioneered for more than 200 years. There are multiple ways to get involved and support the Ri and to think more deeply about the wonders and applications of science. The Royal Institution is a registered charity, no 227938.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 177
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Denver Botanic Gardens

1007 York St., Denver, 80206, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.botanicgardens.org

Green inside and out, Denver Botanic Gardens is considered one of the top botanical gardens in the United States and a pioneer in water conservation. Accredited by the American Association of Museums, the Gardens’ living collections encompass specimens from the tropics to the tundra, showcasing a plant palette chosen to thrive in Colorado’s semi-arid climate. The Gardens'​ dynamic, 24-acre urban oasis in the heart of the city, offers unforgettable opportunities to flourish with unique garden experiences for the whole family – as well as world-class education and plant conservation research programs. Additional sites at Chatfield Farms, a 700-acre wildlife and native plant refuge in Jefferson County; and Mount Goliath, a high-altitude trail and interpretive site on the Mount Evans Scenic Byway, extend this experience throughout the Front Range.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 323
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-royal-institution-of-great-britain.jpeg
The Royal Institution
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-botanic-gardens.jpeg
Denver Botanic Gardens
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Royal Institution
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Denver Botanic Gardens
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Royal Institution in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Denver Botanic Gardens in 2026.

Incident History — The Royal Institution (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Royal Institution cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Denver Botanic Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Denver Botanic Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-royal-institution-of-great-britain.jpeg
The Royal Institution
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-botanic-gardens.jpeg
Denver Botanic Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Denver Botanic Gardens company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Royal Institution company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Denver Botanic Gardens company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Royal Institution company.

In the current year, Denver Botanic Gardens company and The Royal Institution company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Denver Botanic Gardens company nor The Royal Institution company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Denver Botanic Gardens company nor The Royal Institution company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Denver Botanic Gardens company nor The Royal Institution company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Royal Institution company nor Denver Botanic Gardens company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Royal Institution nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Royal Institution company nor Denver Botanic Gardens company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Denver Botanic Gardens company employs more people globally than The Royal Institution company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Royal Institution nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Royal Institution nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Royal Institution nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Royal Institution nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Royal Institution nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Royal Institution nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References